The effect of probing without irrigatio
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- asolacrimal Duct Obstruction.Epiphora
- Registration Number
- IRCT201108227219N3
- Lead Sponsor
- Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Department of Research
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
Inclusion Criteria
inclusion criteria :The main eligibility criteria were epiphora, increased tear meniscus, mucopurulent discharge. The fluorscein dye disappearance test was used to confirm the diagnosis.
exclusion criteria : the patients who have history of failed probing .
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Efficacy comparison nasolacrimal duct probing with versus without irrigation congenital NLDO meta-analysis
Predictive factors success failure congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction probing pediatric outcomes
Complications nasolacrimal duct probing children management strategies false passage infection hemorrhage
Pathophysiology congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction Hasner valve embryology anatomical factors
Conservative versus surgical management congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction treatment algorithm comparison