Paracervical Versus Intracervical Lidocaine for Suction Curettage: A Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 89
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Pain Score, as Assessed Using a 10 cm Linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study is to estimate the efficacy of intracervical versus paracervical block on pain experienced during first trimester suction curettage without the use of preoperative cervical ripening. Because of the theoretical improved reliability of stromal block, the investigators hypothesize that intracervical block would produce lower pain scores than paracervical block at the time of cervical dilation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Women presenting for elective first trimester abortion
排除标准
- •Gestation over 12 weeks by ultrasound
- •Weight less than 98 pounds
- •Known allergy to lidocaine
- •Known nonviable pregnancy
研究组 & 干预措施
1
干预措施: Paracervical block (Procedure)
1
干预措施: Buffered Lidocaine, vasopressin, sodium bicarbonate (Drug)
2
干预措施: Intracervical (Procedure)
2
干预措施: Buffered Lidocaine, vasopressin, sodium bicarbonate (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Pain Score, as Assessed Using a 10 cm Linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
时间窗: at completion of procedure
VAS on a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being lowest pain and 10 highest amount of pain
次要结局
- Gestational Age at Time of Procedure(At the time of the procedure)
研究者
Jessica Kingston
Clinical Professor
University of California, San Diego