MedPath

Plate Fixation Versus Intramedullary Nailing of 3 and 4 Part Proximal Humerus Fractures

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Shoulder Fractures
Humeral Fractures, Proximal
Interventions
Procedure: Philos plate
Procedure: Multiloc nail
Registration Number
NCT02944058
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Akershus
Brief Summary

The purpose of the project is to compare the management of 3 and 4 part proximal humerus fractures (PHF) with an angular stable plate (Philos) with that of an intramedullary nail (Multiloc) in light of complications, radiological, economical, functional and clinical outcome.

Detailed Description

Randomized controlled trial (RCT) from Akershus University Hospital in Norway. Randomization between two implants. The investigators will use deltopectoral or deltoid split as surgical access. All patients will have calcar screws and cuff sutures. When lack of bone for example after decompressing valgus compressed fractures, a bone-substitute might be used in the surgeons preference. Follow up in outpatient clinic at 6, 12, 52 and 104 weeks, but also a 5 year follow up is planned. Postoperative radiographs of both shoulders and CT of operated shoulder will be taken.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
79
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients > 18 years
  2. Severe displacement, defined as malposition of at least 45⁰ of angular deviation in valgus or 30⁰ in varus in true frontal projection, regardless of whether the fracture is impacted or not. Fractures with more than 50% displacement of the head against the surgical neck
  3. The greater or lesser tubercles must be fractured in a 3 or 4-part fracture. The degree of displacement is not critical for inclusion.
Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Fracture more than 3 weeks' old
  2. Caput humeri just a thin shell or split
  3. Ipsilateral damage that will influence the recovery and scoring systems
  4. Incapability to protect osteosynthesis, i.e. use of crutches because of injury to lower extremity.
  5. Pathological fracture
  6. Neurovascular injury
  7. Open fracture
  8. Noncompliance
  9. Congenital anomaly
  10. Ongoing infectious process around the incision site for plate osteosynthesis
  11. Systemic disease that may influence healing processes or scoring systems (RA/MS)
  12. Fracture dislocation
  13. Substance abuse
  14. Inability to read and understand Norwegian
  15. Patients not residing in our catchment area
  16. Patients with too small humerus diameter to use a nail
  17. Patient not able to commit and understand written consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Philos platePhilos plateIntervention is surgery with Philos plate
Multiloc nailMultiloc nailIntervention is surgery with Multiloc nail
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score (questionnaire) Disability of the arm, shoulder and arm score (DASH score)5 years

Quick Dash (questionnaire) the first 6 weeks after surgery, then DASH score (questionnaire for patients to fill out) in follow ups

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Constant score (questionnaire)5years

A questionnaire for the doctor or the physiotherapist to fill out, including registration of: Pain, Power, Range of motion and ADL (x/100, where 100 is best score)

Complications5 years

Infection, Avascular necrosis, thrombosis, nerve compression or damage, Pseudoarthrosis

Radiological complications5 years

Plate cutout, Nail migration, screw cutout, Reduction of Head shaft angle (HSA)/ Varus subsidence,

Health economy5 years

Registration of visits to doctor, physiotherapist, sick leave, re-operations

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Akershus University hospital

🇳🇴

Lørenskog, Norway

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath