Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05710601
NCT05710601CompletedNot Applicable

Effects of Tissue Sealers on Minor Laparoscopic Procedures Between Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents

University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Vision of the surgical field

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The kind of equipment used during laparoscopic surgery may have an effect on how quickly resident surgeons improve their skills.

The effects of these technologies on various general and specialized procedures have been the subject of numerous research, all of which have produced comparable results in terms of efficacy and safety. Although a minimally invasive laparoscopy represents the gold standard method in over 70% of procedures for uterine and adnexal benign diseases, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the potential advantages or disadvantages of such kinds of devices in gynecologic laparoscopy.

Based on this, the purpose of this study was to determine whether using a hemostatic surgical device affects how quickly gynecology residents learn to execute simple laparoscopic procedures and how well they perform surgically.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Senior gynecological surgeons
  • At least 4 years of residency in gynecology

Exclusion Criteria

  • Junior residents, fellows, consultants
  • Operative procedures due to malignancy
  • Women who were not suitable for or denied a laparoscopic approach
  • Declined the procedure
  • Did not sign a written informed consent form
  • Suffering from a gynecologic malignant disease or severe systemic illnesses
  • Laparotomic conversion

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Vision of the surgical field

Time Frame: 7 days

Numeric Rate Scale (NRS) 0-10 considering 0 for "inadequate vision" and 10 for "optimal vision"

Interpretation of the difficulty of the intervention

Time Frame: 7 days

NRS 0-10 (considering 0 for "extremely easy" and 10 for "extremely difficult")

Secondary Outcomes

  • Overall procedural satisfaction(7 days)
  • Procedure time(Procedure)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Gaetano Riemma

Primary Investigator

University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials