Comparison of Two-hand Mask Ventilation Technique: Standard V-E Versus Reversal V-E Technique
- Conditions
- Intubation
- Interventions
- Procedure: Reversal V-E ventilation techniqueProcedure: Standard V-E ventilation technique
- Registration Number
- NCT03170037
- Lead Sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Brief Summary
This study hypothesizes that a novel reversal V-E ventilation technique will retain its high efficiency as that of standard V-E technique and will be easier to use.
- Detailed Description
Despite advances in intubation technology, difficult airways persist. Because it is failure to oxygenate, not failure to intubate, that ultimately leads to brain injury and cardiovascular collapse, effective mask ventilation is at least as important as successful intubation. Therefore optimizing mask ventilation is crucial for clinicians. When difficult mask ventilation encounters, clinicians often switch to two hand technique to hold the mask including either "C-E" clamp or "V-E" clamp. Both volume mode ventilation and pressure mode ventilation are superior with the V-E technique as compared to the C-E technique. The study will test the hypothesis that a novel reversal V-E mask ventilation technique will retain its high efficiency as that of standard V-E technique but be easier to use than standard V-E technique.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 92
- Over 18 years of age
- Requiring general anesthesia
- BMI =>30
- Untreated ischemic heart diseases
- Respiratory disorders, including COPD and asthma
- American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical class of 4 or greater
- Undergoing emergency surgery
- Requiring rapid sequence intubation for aspiration protection
- Non propofol - induction of anesthesia
- Requiring fiberoptic intubation
- Pregnant women or women who have given birth within the last month
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Reversal V-E ventilation technique Reversal V-E ventilation technique After induction of anesthesia subject will be ventilated using the reversal V-E ventilation technique. Ventilation will be carried out using pressure mode ventilation at respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute, I:E ratio of 1:2, peak inspiratory pressure of 20cmH2O and no PEEP. If the subjects can be adequately ventilated, as defined by perceivable chest movement and end tidal CO2 during the first three breaths, ventilation will continue for total ten breaths. Standard V-E ventilation technique Standard V-E ventilation technique After induction of anesthesia subject will be ventilated using the standard V-E ventilation technique. Ventilation will be carried out using pressure mode ventilation at respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute, I:E ratio of 1:2, peak inspiratory pressure of 20cmH2O and no PEEP. If the subjects can be adequately ventilated, as defined by perceivable chest movement and end tidal CO2 during the first three breaths, ventilation will continue for total ten breaths.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual score of friendliness of mask holding technique using 11 point scale Conclusion of masked ventilation (approximately 5 minutes) Visual score of friendliness of mask holding technique using 11 point scale when 0 is easy and 10 is difficult.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method AUC of exhaled tidal volume (Vt) trace Period of masked ventilation (approximately 5 minutes) Comparison of AUC of exhaled tidal volume trace
Peak inspiratory airway pressure Period of masked ventilation (approximately 5 minutes) Peak inspiratory airway pressure
Vt/AUC Period of masked ventilation (approximately 5 minutes) Vt/AUC of exhaled Vt
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
🇺🇸Nashville, Tennessee, United States