Comparison of different sample types for respiratory microbiome analysis using the ISpro technology
- Conditions
- J44.9J18J45C34J84.9E84Pneumonia, organism unspecifiedChronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecifiedAsthmaMalignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung
- Registration Number
- DRKS00022094
- Lead Sponsor
- Pneumologie/Allergologie, Medizinische Klinik 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt – Goethe-Universität
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Part 1
Written informed consent, In- or outpatient at the Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Existing diagnosis of one or more of the following: pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, lung carcinoma, interstitial lung disease, cystic fibrosis
Part 2
Written informed consent, Scheduled bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage
Suspected or confirmed pulmonary infection with a pathogen of risk group 3 or higher (e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis) as published by Committee on Biological Agents / German Federal Institute of Occupational Safety and Health,
Inability to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method First part of the study: Improving the detection of airway bacteria by ISpro technology.<br><br>Second part of the study:<br>Demonstrate that throat-/ nose-swabs or sputum samples are a viable alternative to bronchoalveolar lavage for analyzing the airway microbiome by ISpro technology
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method