Effect Of PRF Versus Xenograft In Closed Sinus Lift.

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Implant or Graft; Rejection

• Registration Number: NCT03684954
• Lead Sponsor: Mahmoud adel shaaban

Brief Summary

Indirect sinus lift with used PRF as a graft material versus xenograft

Detailed Description

Crestal incision and reflect the tissue until exposure of the bone, then use drilling to make osteotomy. Then use sutable osteotomes to elevate the sinus floor, then pack of Prf or bone graft in the osteotomy and implant placement . Then closed the flap and suturing.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2018-09
• Study First Submitted: 2018-09-16
• Study First Submitted QC: 2018-09-25
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-09-25
• Study First Posted: 2018-09-26
• Last Update Posted: 2018-09-26
• Study Start: 2018-10-01
• Primary Completion: 2019-08-30
• Study Completion: 2019-08-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 10

Inclusion Criteria

• Edentulous area and bone high at least 5-6 mm below the maxillary sinus at maxillary premolar.
• Good oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria

• bad oral hygiene.
• patient with systemic disease that may affect normal healing
• pregnant patients.
• patients with bone diseases and presence of periapical pathology affecting the neighboring teeth.
• Heavy smoker more than 20 cigarettes per day

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Primary stability by ostell device	up to 3 months	Implant stability will be mesured by ostell device, implant stability will be mesured intra operative at 0 ( time of implant placement ) and 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12 weeks after surgery