Comparison of Kinesio Taping and Dry Needling in Grade 1, 2 Knee Osteoarthritis
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Interventions
- Other: Kinesio TapingOther: Dry Needling
- Registration Number
- NCT06086717
- Lead Sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Brief Summary
This study's aim was:
- To determine the effects of kinesio taping and dry needling on pain, ROMs, functional mobility, and quality of life in knee OA patients.
- Detailed Description
This was a randomized clinical trial in which Grade 1, 2 Knee Osteoarthritis patients were randomized into two groups: Group-A and Group-B. Group-A participants received Kinesio taping while Group-B participants received dry needling as an adjunct to the conventional physical therapy treatment. The intervention was carried out for four weeks with frequency of two sessions per week. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, after two weeks, and after 4 weeks, using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Range of Motion (ROM), and SF-12 Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- Clinically diagnosed patients of grade 1, 2 knee OA (Kallgren and Lawrence).
- Pain and/or tenderness around knee joint
- Knee OA patients with tightness in Quadriceps, Hamstrings, and Iliotibial band.
- Patients with pain of >4 on VAS.
- Patients who had received Intra-articular Steroid injections in knee joints.
- Patients who had suffered a traumatic injury to knee joint within past 6 months prior to this study.
- Patients with any surgical intervention to the knee joints.
- Patients with peripheral vascular disease.
- Patients with diagnosed tumors, malignancies, infection associated with knee joint.
- Patients with lower limb metallic implants.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group A Kinesio Taping Kinesio Taping Group Group B Dry Needling Dry Needling Group
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain Score Baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks. Pain was measured using Visual Analog Scale on a score from zero (0=no pain) to ten (10=worst pain possible).
Knee ROM Baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks. Knee ROM (flexion and extension) was assessed using universal goniometer.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality of Life Score Baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks. Patients health-related quality of life was assessed using SF-12 questionnaire.
WOMAC Score Baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks. Patients' pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints was assessed using WOMAC scale.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Riphah International University (RIU)
🇵🇰Islamabad, Islamabad Capital Territory, Pakistan