MedPath

A Multilevel, Multiphase Optimization Strategy for PrEP (MOST:PrEP)

Not Applicable
Conditions
HIV Seropositivity
Interventions
Behavioral: Best Practice Alert
Behavioral: Computer-based simulation training for providers
Behavioral: PrEP Informational Video
Behavioral: HIV Risk Assessment
Registration Number
NCT06334341
Lead Sponsor
Henry Ford Health System
Brief Summary

What is known: There are 1.2 million people in the US who meet the indications for PrEP; yet, disparities exist in uptake. For example, only 9% of Black and 16% of Latino individuals, compared to 65% of White individuals, have been prescribed PrEP. At Henry Ford Health (HFH) system, only 10% of eligible patients have been prescribed PrEP. Primary care is an ideal setting for PrEP to be offered as an HIV prevention method since providers see large numbers of patients who are HIV negative, with some who are at increased risk for HIV, and the primary care setting is often the point of entry to the healthcare system. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework is a novel, innovative way to identify an efficient intervention. What will be done: In this optimization trial, the investigators will test the effectiveness of intervention components, alone and in combination, on new PrEP prescriptions in primary care at HFH. First, feedback will be generated on context-specific (system and individual level) factors for intervention component delivery via focus groups with providers (n=15) and patients eligible for PrEP (n=30). Then, four intervention components will be tested in an optimization trial, with 16 conditions being implemented at 32 clinics. Finally, feedback will be generated on the factors that affected implementation via semi-structured interviews with providers (n=30) and patients (n=30). Participants will be primary care providers (PCPs) and patients eligible for PrEP in Henry Ford Health System. Clinics will be randomized (yes/no) to receive any combination of provider and patient intervention components. Provider intervention components include computer-based simulation training and/or best practice alerts delivered via the electronic health record (EHR). Patient intervention components include HIV risk assessment and/or PrEP informational video - both delivered via the EHR. Primary outcome is the rate of new PrEP prescriptions at the clinic level. Secondary outcomes will include PrEP maintenance, number of HIV tests ordered by a PCP, and number of PCPs trained. Sub analyses will test which factors moderate (e.g., patient sex, race, age, gender, sexual orientation) or mediate (e.g., perceived HIV risk, provider and patient PrEP knowledge) PrEP uptake, focusing on priority populations and disparities in rates of PrEP prescription. Implications: 1) Understanding which intervention components lead to increased PrEP prescriptions will represent an important advance in HIV prevention efforts. 2) Optimizing a multi-level intervention for providers and patients to increase PrEP prescriptions would lead to a new, efficient, evidence-based option. 3) Determining what factors are related to PrEP uptake will help reduce disparities in PrEP initiation among those most in need. 4) Understanding the context specific factors related to intervention component implementation will help identify best methods for replication/adaptation in other healthcare systems.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1380
Inclusion Criteria
  • Provider:≥ 18-years old
  • Provider: employed at HFH as a primary care provider
  • Provider: eligible to write prescriptions in the state of Michigan
  • Patient: ≥ 18 years old
  • Patient: have an appointment with a Henry Ford primary care clinic during the study period
  • Patient: have an EHR account
  • Patient: meet the indications for PrEP
Exclusion Criteria
  • Provider: not a HFH primary care provider
  • Provider: does not have prescribing privileges in the state of Michigan
  • Patient: currently prescribed or taking PrEP
  • Patient: living with HIV

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
FACTORIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Best Practice Alert and Risk AssessmentBest Practice AlertBest Practice Alert and Patient Risk Assessment
Best Practice Alert, Risk Assessment and VideoBest Practice AlertBest Practice Alert, Patient Risk Assessment, and Patient PrEP Video
Training and VideoPrEP Informational VideoProvider Training and Patient PrEP Video
Training and Risk AssessmentComputer-based simulation training for providersProvider Training and Patient Risk Assessment
Training, Best Practice Alert, and VideoBest Practice AlertProvider Training, Best Practice Alert, and Patient PrEP Video
Training and VideoComputer-based simulation training for providersProvider Training and Patient PrEP Video
Training and Risk AssessmentHIV Risk AssessmentProvider Training and Patient Risk Assessment
VideoPrEP Informational VideoPatient PrEP Video only
Risk AssessmentHIV Risk AssessmentPatient Risk Assessment only
Risk Assessment and VideoPrEP Informational VideoPatient Risk Assessment and Patient PrEP Video
Best Practice Alert and VideoBest Practice AlertBest Practice Alert and Patient PrEP Video
Best Practice Alert, Risk Assessment and VideoHIV Risk AssessmentBest Practice Alert, Patient Risk Assessment, and Patient PrEP Video
Best Practice Alert, Risk Assessment and VideoPrEP Informational VideoBest Practice Alert, Patient Risk Assessment, and Patient PrEP Video
Training and Best Practice AlertBest Practice AlertProvider Training and Best Practice Alert
Training, Best Practice Alert, and VideoPrEP Informational VideoProvider Training, Best Practice Alert, and Patient PrEP Video
Risk Assessment and VideoHIV Risk AssessmentPatient Risk Assessment and Patient PrEP Video
Best Practice AlertBest Practice AlertBest Practice Alert only
Best Practice Alert and VideoPrEP Informational VideoBest Practice Alert and Patient PrEP Video
TrainingComputer-based simulation training for providersProvider Training
Training, Best Practice Alert, and Risk AssessmentHIV Risk AssessmentProvider Training, Best Practice Alert, and Patient Risk Assessment
Training, Risk Assessment, and VideoComputer-based simulation training for providersProvider Training, Patient Risk Assessment, and Patient PrEP Video
Training, Risk Assessment, and VideoPrEP Informational VideoProvider Training, Patient Risk Assessment, and Patient PrEP Video
Training and Best Practice AlertComputer-based simulation training for providersProvider Training and Best Practice Alert
Training, Best Practice Alert, Risk Assessment, and VideoHIV Risk AssessmentProvider Training, Best Practice Alert, Patient Risk Assessment, and Patient PrEP Video
Training, Risk Assessment, and VideoHIV Risk AssessmentProvider Training, Patient Risk Assessment, and Patient PrEP Video
Training, Best Practice Alert, and VideoComputer-based simulation training for providersProvider Training, Best Practice Alert, and Patient PrEP Video
Training, Best Practice Alert, and Risk AssessmentBest Practice AlertProvider Training, Best Practice Alert, and Patient Risk Assessment
Training, Best Practice Alert, Risk Assessment, and VideoComputer-based simulation training for providersProvider Training, Best Practice Alert, Patient Risk Assessment, and Patient PrEP Video
Training, Best Practice Alert, Risk Assessment, and VideoBest Practice AlertProvider Training, Best Practice Alert, Patient Risk Assessment, and Patient PrEP Video
Training, Best Practice Alert, Risk Assessment, and VideoPrEP Informational VideoProvider Training, Best Practice Alert, Patient Risk Assessment, and Patient PrEP Video
Training, Best Practice Alert, and Risk AssessmentComputer-based simulation training for providersProvider Training, Best Practice Alert, and Patient Risk Assessment
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinic-Level PrEP PrescriptionYear 1 and Year 5 electronic health record data pull.

The number of new PrEP prescriptions written within 6-months of the study-associated patient appointment. It is defined as a new documented prescription in the patient electronic health records for PrEP (daily pill or injection) at any date between the initial study primary care appointment plus 180 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
PrEP awarenessProvider pre-post survey and patient demographic and 6- month surveys

PrEP awareness will be measured by the statement "there is a pill (drug/medication) that a person can take to prevent transmission of HIV from an infected (HIV positive) sex partner to an uninfected (HIV negative) partner." with responses true/false, don't know.

PrEP prescribing comfortPre-intervention and immediately after the intervention for providers

PrEP prescribing comfort will be measured by 9- items from the PrEP Information, Motivation, and Behaviors survey.

PrEP prescribing intentionsPre-intervention and immediately after the intervention for providers

PrEP prescribing intentions will be measured by 8- items from the PrEP Information, Motivation, and Behaviors survey.

Perceived HIV riskPatient demographic and 6- month surveys

Patients perceived HIV risk will be measured by 10- items from the Perceived Risk of HIV scale.

Preferences for patient- provider communicationPatient demographic and 6- month surveys

Preferences for patient-provider communications will be measured by the Control Preferences Scale, the Communication Assessment Tool, and the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale.

PrEP KnowledgeProvider pre-post survey and patient demographic and 6- month surveys

PrEP knowledge will be measured by 6-items assessing PrEP dosing frequency, approved FDA medications, HIV antibody testing prior to PrEP initiation, HIV testing frequency while on PrEP, contraindications to prescribing PrEP, and routine standard of care practices for patients taking PrEP

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Henry Ford Health

🇺🇸

Detroit, Michigan, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath