Comparison of Ambu Auragain and I-Gel Supraglottic Airways in Adult Patients at an Ambulatory Surgery Center
- Conditions
- AnesthesiaSurgery
- Interventions
- Device: I-Gel Laryngeal Mask AirwayDevice: Ambu Auragain Laryngeal Mask Airway
- Registration Number
- NCT04286581
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if an I-gel laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure compared to an Ambu Auragain in adult patients in an ambulatory surgery center.
- Detailed Description
Patients who are scheduled for elective ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia will be randomized to one of two groups. Group 1 will receive an I-gel laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and group 2 will receive an Ambu Auragain LMA.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 148
- undergoing outpatient ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia that is amenable to using a laryngeal mask airway
- non-English speaking patients
- patients with abnormal airway anatomy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Igel Larnygeal Mask Airway I-Gel Laryngeal Mask Airway Group 1 will receive the I-Gel Laryngeal Mask Airway for airway maintenance during general anesthesia Ambu Auragain Laryngeal mask airway Ambu Auragain Laryngeal Mask Airway Group 2 will receive the Ambu Auragain Laryngeal Mask Airway for airway maintenance during general anesthesia
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) immediately after placement OLP will be measured immediately after insertion. This will be accomplished by closing the expiratory valve while keeping fresh gas flow at 3 liters/minute until equilibrium is reached. Pressure will be reported in cmH2O.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Sore Throat 24 hours post-surgery Participants will be asked upon discharge from recovery room (approximately 8 hours post surgery) to rate the soreness of their throat on a numerical rating scale of 0-10 (0 being no soreness and 10 being maximum imaginable soreness). Participants will be asked to rate throat soreness again via phone call approximately 24 hours after surgery.
Time to Placement time from opening mouth to successful placement (4 hours) Time required to place laryngeal mask airway will be measured and reported in seconds.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Minnesota
🇺🇸Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States