ISRCTN10540035Completed未知
In children with cleft palate speech disorder, is there a statistically significant difference in speech outcomes, activity and participation, when intervention is delivered by trained parents supported by connective health (PLAT), compared with routine care? A comparative study of Parent Led, Therapist Supervised, Articulation Therapy (PLAT) versus routine speech therapy intervention for children with cleft palate speech disorders
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust0 sites46 target enrollmentStarted: December 12, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- 未知
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 46
Study Overview
Brief Summary
2020 Results article in https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12542 results (added 20/08/2020)
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •For children:
- •1. Aged between 3 and 6.5 years
- •2. Presenting with cleft palate with or without cleft lip at birth or velopharyngeal dysfunction, with or without a syndrome not associated with learning disability, with or without suspected velopharyngeal insufficiency
- •3. Presenting with at least one cleft speech characteristic, with or without developmental speech errors
- •4. Stimulable for at least one novel consonant
- •5. Has age-appropriate attention and listening skills, behaviour and receptive and expressive language levels
- •6. Fluent in English
- •For parents:
- •7. Fluent in English,
- •8. No diagnosed learning disability or mental health issues
- •9. Able to commit the time to undertake the intervention for 12 weeks
Exclusion Criteria
- •For children:
- •1. Has a syndrome with an associated learning disability
- •2. Has a known neurological deficit
- •3. Has behavioral problems
- •4. Has a bilateral hearing loss of greater than 30 decibels
- •5. Has a symptomatic fistula judged to affect articulation
- •6. Velopharyngeal surgery planned within the following 4 months
- •7. Presenting only with lateralisation/palatalisation or double articulation, or has no intra-oral air pressure on pressure consonants
- •For parents:
- •8. Known learning disability or mental health issues
- •9. Unable to make the time commitment
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Auditory Profile and Language Development in Children Operated for Cleft PalateDeafnessNCT04367961Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris50
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Prospective Evaluation of Speech Function Through Patient- and Parent-response Outcome Measurements in Velopharyngeal InsufficiencyVelopharyngeal Insufficiency in Children With Isolated or Combined Cleft PalateNCT05838261Umeå University50
Recruiting
Not Applicable
A Comparison of Speech Outcome in Pediatric Cleft Patients, After Modified Furlow-Sommerlad Palatoplasty in Comparison to Modified Furlow Palatoplasty AloneCleft Palate ChildrenNCT03995199AZ Sint-Jan AV60
Completed
Not Applicable
Delayed Language Development in Children With Cleft Palate at Sohag University HospitalDelayed Language in Cleft PalateNCT06151340Sohag University150
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Speech intervention for preschoolers with cleft palate using principles of motor learningspeech disordercleft palatePhysical Medicine / Rehabilitation - Speech therapyACTRN12616001446459The University of Sydney4