Use of Antibacterial Cement in Infected Dentin
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Interventions
- Other: Antibacterial cement
- Registration Number
- NCT01449136
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Pernambuco
- Brief Summary
Dental materials with antibacterial properties can prevent the harmful effects caused by oral cariogenic bacteria. This double-blind controlled clinical trial evaluated the performance of antibacterial cement for sealing infected dentin in atraumatic restorations of primary molars.
- Detailed Description
The study enrolled 45 children (45 teeth) between 5 and 8 years of age, of both genders, divided into two groups. In group A (GA; n=22), the cavities were lined with conventional glass ionomer cement (Vidrion F®) and in group B (GB; n=23), with antibacterial cement (Vidrion F® containing 1% each of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and cefaclor). Both groups were restored with Ketac Molar Easymix®. Molars with carious lesions on the inner half of dentin without clinical or radiographic pulp damage were selected. Patients were evaluated clinically (for pain, fistulas, or mobility) and radiographically (area of caries, periapical region, and furcation of teeth) after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 45
- signed consent from a parent or guardian;
- primary molars with carious lesions on the inner half of dentin;
- access of caries lesions to dentin spoons.
- damaged pulp determined clinically (for pain, fistulas, tooth mobility);
- damaged pulp determined radiography (bone or dental pathology);
- children taking antibiotics;
- children who refused the treatment;
- children had systemic disease.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description antibacterial cement Antibacterial cement -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method number of successful restorations with a dental liner with antibiotics differences of overall success between baseline and the evaluations performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The absence of pain, fistulas, and mobility throughout the study was considered clinical success and the decreased or unchanged area of caries (obtained by a software to accurately measure distances between anatomical points selected by the operator of radiolucent zone beneath the restoration) and no bone or dental disorder was detected was considered radiographic success.
Overall success was defined as clinical and radiographic success being achieved simultaneously.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
UFPB
🇧🇷João Pessoa, PB, Brazil