跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01118403
NCT01118403撤回4 期

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Early Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Neurological Patients: A Randomized Trial

Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2011年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
撤回
发起方
试验地点
1
主要终点
Impact of prophylaxis with ampicillin sulbactam versus placebo on the incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia

研究概览

简要总结

This study seeks to assess whether coma patients really benefit from the use of antibiotics as a prophylactic for reducing the incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia in this population group. For this we consider the use of ampicillin sulbactam antibiotic which has a low ability to induce resistance, efficacy and safety observed during the time that has been used, even in patients with neurosurgical pathology, and to be broadly available in our environment.

Our hypothesis is that neurological patients in coma state, requiring mechanical ventilation, the application of antibiotic prophylaxis compared with placebo reduces the incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia.

详细描述

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common nosocomial infections occur in intensive care units, with frequencies ranging between 15% and 45%, which determine an attributable mortality of 25% to 27%

Patients with compromised state of consciousness brought to mechanical ventilation, have a much higher reported incidence that patients without neurological involvement, reaches between 44 and 70%.

These data have led to plan the implementation of strategies to reduce the incidence of early pneumonia in this population group, to thereby favorably influence the high rates of mortality, morbidity and costs that arise.

Then we design this study to assess whether these patients really benefit from the use of antibiotics as a prophylactic, considering also the high impact that this would have given the high incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia in this population group.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All patients admitted to intensive care units,with score in the Glasgow Coma scale less than nine.
  • Requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours
  • Includes all patients with structural or metabolic coma

排除标准

  • Pregnant women
  • History of allergic reactions to ampicillin sulbactam
  • Patients admitted as potential organ donors
  • Patients with an indication of antibiotic therapy, or who have received more than 2 doses of any antibiotic previously.
  • Hospital stay for more than 48 hours before intubation.

研究组 & 干预措施

Sultamicillin, Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Experimental

Sultamicillin, Antibiotic Prophylaxis

干预措施: Sultamicillin (Drug)

Placebo

Placebo Comparator

Physiologic Sodium Chloride Solution

干预措施: Sultamicillin (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Impact of prophylaxis with ampicillin sulbactam versus placebo on the incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia

时间窗: 2 years

To determine the impact of prophylaxis with ampicillin sulbactam versus placebo on the incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with altered level of consciousness with a score on the Glasgow Coma Scale less than or equal to 8 and requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours

次要结局

  • Effect of antibiotic prophylaxis versus placebo on the incidence of other infections(2 years)

研究者

发起方
Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验