Does Adding Power Exercises to Muscle Force Training Result in Superior Benefits for Patellofemoral Pain People? Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
- Sponsor
- Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos
- Enrollment
- 74
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change from baseline pain Intensity at 12 weeks
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is one of the most common forms of knee pain and has a negative impact on the level of physical activity and quality of life of patients. Although strengthening of the hip and knee muscles has good clinical effects in the treatment of PFP, most exercise protocols do not follow the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines and are not clearly described, making it difficult to apply them in practice clinical and research. In addition, recent studies have shown that these patients also have a power deficit of these muscles. However, it is not known whether the addition of power exercises to a muscle strengthening program would result in superior benefits, especially in relation to pain and physical function. Therefore, the objective of this study is to verify if the improvement in pain intensity, physical function, kinesiophobia, self perception of improvement, quality of life and muscle function variables after a training program of strength and muscular power is superior to that observed in an isolated muscle strength training. This study will be randomized and controlled, developed with individuals with DPF, allocated in one of two groups: Strength Training Group (STG) and Strength and Power Training Group (SPTG). The primary outcomes will be intensity of pain and physical function, while the secondary outcomes will be kinesiophobia; self perception of improvement; quality of life; the peak of isometric abductor and hip extensor torque, and knee extensor; and the rate of development of torque of the abductors and extensors of hip, and extensors of knee at 30% and 90% of maximum isometric torque. Participants in both groups will be evaluated before the intervention (pre), after the end of the intervention (post) and three, six and twelve months after the intervention. Data analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. To compare the groups at different times (pre, post and after three, six and twelve months of the intervention) will be used two-way analysis of variance (GROUP X MOMENT) with mixed model, with Bonferroni post hoc to identify specific differences. The significance level will be 0.05.
Investigators
Gabriela Souza de Vasconcelos
Post graduate
Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •men and women with bilateral or unilateral patellofemoral pain
Exclusion Criteria
- •history of knee surgery
- •history of hip or lumbar spine injury or pain
- •patellar instability
- •pain on palpation of the patellar tendon, iliotibial band, Hoffa fat, goose paw tendons or knee joint line
- •signs or symptoms of meniscal or knee ligament injuries
- •presence of Osgood-Schlatter syndrome or Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome
- •any vestibular, neurological or musculoskeletal alterations that interfere or contraindicate the procedures of this study
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change from baseline pain Intensity at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Pre (baseline) treatment, post treatment (12 weeks) and after 3,6 and 12 month (follow-up)
Pain intensity will be assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating extremely intense pain. Participants will indicate their usual pain and their worst pain during the last week (CROSSLEY et al, 2004). The VAS scores will be computed by measuring the length of the line, in millimeters, from the left end (without pain) until the mark made by the participant.
Change from baseline physical function at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Pre (baseline) treatment, post treatment (12 weeks) and after 3,6 and 12 month (follow-up)
The Anterior Knee Pain Scale, a translated and validated Portuguese version (DA CUNHA et al, 2013), will be used to evaluate subjective symptoms, such as anterior knee pain and functional limitations related to PFP. The items assessed in the questionnaire are patellar subluxation, lameness, pain, walking, climbing stairs and remaining seated for prolonged time with knees flexed. It has scores of 0 to 100 points, where 100 means no pain and / or functional limitations and 0 means constant pain and several functional limitations (KUJALA et al, 1993). The Anterior Knee Pain Scale is a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate the function in individuals with PFP (CROSSLEY et al, 2004). The final score will be used for statistical analysis.
Secondary Outcomes
- Self-perception of improvement(Pre (baseline) treatment and post treatment (12 weeks))
- Change Quality of Life(Pre (baseline) treatment and post treatment (12 weeks))
- Maximal Isometric Torque and Rate of Force Development (RFD)(Pre (baseline) treatment and post treatment (12 weeks))
- Kinesiophobia(Pre (baseline) treatment and post treatment (12 weeks))