Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Peer Mentors in Reducing Hospital Use
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Serious Mental Illness
- Sponsor
- Yale University
- Enrollment
- 285
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Service use
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 11 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The current study, through a randomized controlled design, will evaluate the effectiveness of peer support, as compared to usual care and to an equivalent amount of support offered by peer case managers and non-peer recovery mentors, in reducing hospital days and readmissions and in promoting recovery and community inclusion among adults with mental illnesses with histories of multiple hospitalizations. The current study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of adding peer support to the array of services available to persons with serious mental illnesses who have histories of multiple hospitalizations and will test a theoretical model of the active ingredients of peer support, focusing specifically on the roles of 1) instillation of hope through positive self-disclosure; 2) role modeling of self-care and exploring new ways of using experiential knowledge; and 3) a trusting relationship characterized by acceptance, understanding, and empathy with conditional regard.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •2 or more psychiatric hospitalizations in the past year
- •A diagnosis of serious mental illness
Exclusion Criteria
- •Dementia or other organic condition limiting ability to provide informed consent
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Service use
Time Frame: 3 months
Via self-report from the participant
Service Use
Time Frame: 9 months
Via self-report from the participant
Secondary Outcomes
- Psychiatric symptoms(9 months)
- Quality of life(3 month)
- Community inclusion(3 months)
- Quality of Life(9 months)
- Community Inclusion(9 months)