Comparison of different methods of airway management in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries.

Completed

Conditions: Patients with Gall Bladder Stone disease for elective cholecystectomy were chosen. Pateints with mouth opening less than 2.5 cm,with upper respiratory tract infection were excluded.

Registration Number: CTRI/2015/06/005919

Lead Sponsor: Govt Medical College and Hospital

Brief Summary: The primary purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy between Supreme laryngeal mask airway and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic surgeries and to study any difference between hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters between the two groups. Supreme laryngeal mask airway was found to be more efficacious in terms of ease and time of insertion of laryngeal mask airway. However no difference was found in the hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters between the two groups.

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: Completed

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 80

Inclusion Criteria

1.Age group b/w 20 to 60 years 2.American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I and II 3.Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria

The following patients were excluded from the study.
1.Patients with known or predicted difficult airway or MPG III/IV.
2.Patients with mouth opening of less than 2.5 cm.
3.Patients with history of upper respiratory tract infection.
4.Patients with increased risk of regurgitation and aspiration.
5.Patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg.m.-2 6.Patients unable to understand the study protocol.

Study & Design

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Ease of insertion of equipment,	Time for successful insertion of equipment and time of insertion of orogastric tube
Cuff Pressure of equipment,	Time for successful insertion of equipment and time of insertion of orogastric tube
oropharyngeal leak pressure	Time for successful insertion of equipment and time of insertion of orogastric tube

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Any morbidity,adverse effect	In first 24 hours

Trial Locations

Locations (1): Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
🇮🇳
Chandigarh, CHANDIGARH, India
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
🇮🇳Chandigarh, CHANDIGARH, India
Dr Lakesh Anand
Principal investigator
09646121522
lkanand11@gmail.com