MedPath

Buccal Versus Intranasal Route of Administration of Midazolam Spray in Behavior Management of Pre-School Patients

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Dental Anxiety
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04608734
Lead Sponsor
Nourhan M.Aly
Brief Summary

Purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of aerosolized midazolam, introduced through buccal versus intranasal mucosa in managing uncooperative children undergoing dental treatment.

Detailed Description

Thirty six children fulfilling the requirements of having a dental condition that needed treatment in two dental settings, not exceeding thirty minutes each. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups, according to the treatment offered at the first visit. At the first visit, either buccal or intranasal aerosolized midazolam was administered. At the second visit the alternate route was implemented in a cross-over design with a one week washout period. Vital signs were recorded at baseline and at 5 minutes interval throughout the treatment session.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  • Negative and definitely negative behavior according Frankl's scale.
  • ASA Group I (normal healthy patient without systemic disease) and II (patient with mild systemic disease) with no medical contraindication which rules out the use of midazolam.
  • Children with at least two carious lesions requiring dental intervention in two settings of not more than 30 minute each.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Children with multiple carious lesions who require treatment under general anesthesia.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Buccal midazolamBuccal midazolam-
Intranasal midazolamIntranasal midazolam-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sleep scoreafter 5 minutes

This will be assessed using modified Houpt scale for behavior rating:

1. Awake, alert.

2. Drowsy, disoriented.

3. Intermittently asleep.

4. Sound asleep.

Crying scoreafter 5 minutes

This will be assessed using modified Houpt scale for behavior rating:

1. Hysterical, demands attention.

2. Continuous, making treatment difficult.

3. Intermittent, mild, does not interfere with treatment.

4. No crying present.

Head/oral resistance scoreafter 5 minutes

This will be assessed using modified Houpt scale for behavior rating:

1. Turns head, refuses to open mouth.

2. Mouth closing, must request to open.

3. Chocking, gagging, spitting.

4. No head/oral resistance present.

Overall behaviorimmediately after completion of the dental treatment procedures

This will be assessed using modified Houpt scale for behavior rating:

1. Aborted, no treatment performed.

2. Very poor, treatment interrupted, partial treatment completed.

3. Fair, difficult, all treatment completed.

4. Good, some limited crying or movement.

5. Excellent, no crying or movement.

Acceptance of drug administrationduring the sedation procedure

Assessed by a 3 point Likert scale as follows: (1) the child accepted the drug readily. 2 (fair) the child accepted the drug with some resistance. 3 (poor) the child accepted the drug with great resistance. 4 (refused) the child refused but drug administration was possible after persuasion.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath