COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PHARYNGOLARYNGEAL MORBIDITY FOLLOWING PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION USING SUCTION CATHETER GUIDED VERSUS INTRODUCER TOOL GUIDED TECHNIQUE
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/05/067676
- Lead Sponsor
- VMMC AND SAFDARJUNG HOSPITA
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. ASA Grade 1 and 2
2. Patient undergoing elective surgery requiring General Anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
1.Pregnant Women
2.Patients requiring Endotracheal Intubation
3.Limited mouth opening
4.Known bleeding or coagulation disorder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparing the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity with the use of suction catheter guided technique versus standard introducer tool guided technique during proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion with regard to incidence of sore throatTimepoint: 1. Baseline <br/ ><br>2. 30 minutes post pLMA Removal <br/ ><br>3. 2 hour post pLMA Removal <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of <br/ ><br>a. Hoarseness of voice <br/ ><br>b. Dysphagia <br/ ><br>c. Cough <br/ ><br>d. Oral/ pharyngeal trauma/ presence of blood on device <br/ ><br>Post operative sore throat score <br/ ><br>Time required for Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway insertionTimepoint: O min. <br/ ><br>5 min. <br/ ><br>15 min <br/ ><br>30 min <br/ ><br>2 hrs <br/ ><br>1 day post completion of surgery <br/ ><br>