A Safety and Efficacy Study of Allogeneic CAR Gamma-Delta T Cells in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Solid Tumors
- Conditions
- Solid Tumor
- Interventions
- Biological: HLA-G-CAR.BiTE allogeneic γδ T cells
- Registration Number
- NCT06150885
- Lead Sponsor
- Ever Supreme Bio Technology Co., Ltd.
- Brief Summary
This study is composed of phase I and IIa parts. The dose-escalation phase I part aims to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to identify the safety of CAR001 in subjects with relapsed/refractory solid tumor; the dose-expansion phase IIa part aims to evaluate the potential efficacy of CAR001 in subjects with relapsed/refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), colorectal cancer (CRC) or Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).
- Detailed Description
Primary Objective:
Phase I:
To evaluate the safety of CAR001 in subjects.
Phase IIa:
To provide potential evidence for the clinical efficacy of CAR001 in improving tumor response rate in subjects.
Secondary Objectives:
To evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of CAR001 in subjects.
Exploratory:
Level of CAR-positive γδT cells in peripheral blood from baseline to subsequent visits. (Time Frame: 12 months after the last infusion)
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
-
Male or female subjects aged ≥ 18 years
-
For phase I part, subjects with histologically confirmed diagnosis of solid tumor with expression of PD-L1 ≥ 1% and are relapsed/refractory to at least two lines of standard-of-care therapy. For phase IIa part, subjects with histologically confirmed diagnosis of TNBC, NSCLC, CRC or GBM with expression of PD-L1 ≥ 1%, and are relapsed/refractory to at least two lines of standard-of-care therapy.
-
With at least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST1.1 (for TNBC, NSCLC or CRC) or RANO (for GBM)
-
Able to understand and sign the ICF
-
Have a life expectancy of > 12 weeks
-
ECOG performance status ≤ 1
-
Recovered from any previous therapy related toxicity to ≤ grade 2 at screening
-
With adequate renal function: serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 X ULN; eGFR > 50 ml/min
-
With adequate liver function: ALT, AST, and ALP ≤ 3X ULN or ≤ 5 X ULN if liver metastases; and total bilirubin ≤ 1.5X ULN or ≤ 3 X ULN if due to Gilbert's disease
-
With PT and PTT ≤ 1.5X ULN
-
With adequate hematopoietic function:
- ANC ≥ 1,000 cells/μl
- Platelets ≥ 75,000 counts/μl
- Total WBC ≥ 2,000 cells/μl
- Hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL
-
Has received any allogeneic cell therapy before screening
-
With known or suspected to be hypersensitivity to CAR001 or its excipients, such as DMSO or human serum albumin
-
With more than one kind of active diagnosed primary cancer
-
With active infection requiring systemic medication
-
With medical conditions who are receiving systemic steroid therapy >10 mg prednisone/day or equivalent dose, or other immune-suppressants in the past 2 weeks
-
Has been diagnosed as HIV positive (confirmed by anti-HIV and nucleic acid test)
-
With acute cardiovascular disease; NYHA classification ≥ 3; or history of myocardial infarction during the past 6 months; or has active uncontrolled arterial hypertension by medical history. Per investigator's judgment, would not make participation appropriate
-
With historical or current auto-immune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, type I diabetes, psoriasis or systemic lupus erythematosus
-
Has uncontrolled psychiatric disorder by medical history
-
Has CNS diseases except GBM or stroke
-
Has received any investigational therapy from another clinical study within 4 weeks
-
Inability to undergo radiological assessment, such as MRI or CT for any reason
-
Has received radiotherapy or chemotherapy within 2 weeks (but palliative radiation therapy (R/T) for pain control are allowed)
-
Not suitable to participate the trial as judged by the investigator
-
Female subject of childbearing potential who:
- Is lactating; or
- Has a positive pregnancy test result at eligibility checking; or
- Refuses to adopt at least two form of birth control from signing informed consent to 1 year after the last administration of CAR001.
-
Male subject with a female spouse/partner who is of childbearing potential refuses to adopt at least two forms of birth control from signing informed consent to 1 year after the last administration of CAR001.
For exclusion criteria #15 and #16, acceptable forms of birth control include:
- Established use of oral, injected, or implanted hormonal methods of contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate < 1 %), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception
- Placement of an intrauterine device or intrauterine system
- Barrier methods of contraception: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description CAR001 HLA-G-CAR.BiTE allogeneic γδ T cells CAR001 cells mixed with normal saline will be administered to patients.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Objective Response Rate (ORR) of CAR001 for Phase IIa part from visit 1 to 24-months of safety and efficacy follow-up period The rate of subjects with CR or PR based on RECIST1.1 in patients with NSCLC, TNBC or CRC; RANO in patients with GBM. Although there is no control group in this study, the ORR after CAR001 administration could be compared to baseline.
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of CAR001 for Phase I part 4 weeks after last dosing of CAR001 MTD was determined by testing increasing doses once a week for 4 weeks via IV on dose escalation cohorts 1 to 5 with 3 to 6 participants each. MTD reflects the highest dose of drug that did not cause a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) in \> 33% of participants. DLTs were defined as any AE ≥ grade 3 (CTCAE v5.0) that is considered to be causally related (possibly, probably, or definitely related) to CAR001 within 4 weeks.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Safety - AEs and SAEs incidences over the study period from visit 1 to 24-months of safety and efficacy follow-up period The incidence of AEs and SAE from screening to the end of study or until documented disease progression.
Safety - Vital signs assessments at each post-treatment from visit 1 to 24-months of safety and efficacy follow-up period Changes of vital signs at each post-treatment measurement or until documented disease progression from baseline.
Safety - Physical Examination at each post-treatment from visit 1 to 24-months of safety and efficacy follow-up period Abnormality in physical examination at each post-treatment measurement or until documented disease progression from baseline.
Efficacy - Change of ECOG Performance Status Scale from visit 1 to 24-months of safety and efficacy follow-up period ECOG Performance Status Scale will be assessed from baseline to subsequent evaluation visits or until documented disease progression.
Safety - Laboratory examinations at each post-treatment from visit 1 to 24-months of safety and efficacy follow-up period Changes of laboratory data at each post-treatment measurement or until documented disease progression from baseline.
Safety - 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) assessments at each post-treatment from visit 1 to 24-months of safety and efficacy follow-up period Changes of ventricular rate, PR interval, QRS interval, and QT interval by 12-lead ECG at each post-treatment measurement or until documented disease progression from baseline.
Efficacy - Progression Free Survival (PFS) rate from visit 1 to 24-months of safety and efficacy follow-up period Time from 1st CAR001 administration to disease progression determined by MRI or CT, or death of the subject whichever comes first. Subjects who do not occur disease progression or mortality until the EOS will be considered as right-censored. Although there is no control group in this study, the PFS after CAR001 administration could be compared to historical data.
Efficacy - Overall Survival (OS) rate from visit 1 to 24-months of safety and efficacy follow-up period Time from 1st CAR001 administration to death. Subjects who do not die until the end of study will be considered as right-censored. Although there is no control group in this study, the OS after CAR001 administration could be compared to historical data. After the EOS, the OS should be followed every 3 months by phone contact.
Efficacy - Change of QoL from baseline from visit 1 to 24-months of safety and efficacy follow-up period QoL will be assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0 from baseline to subsequent evaluation visits or until documented disease progression.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
China Medical University Hospital
🇨🇳Taichung, Non-US, Taiwan