跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01083277
NCT01083277终止不适用

Variable Ventilation During Acute Respiratory Failure

Boston Medical Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 7 人开始时间: 2012年9月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
7
试验地点
2
主要终点
The occurrence of adverse events in the use of variable ventilation versus conventional ventilation, including the loss of any of the following (1) hemodynamic stability, (2) respiratory stability,(3) acid-base stability, and (4) neurological stability.

研究概览

简要总结

Acute respiratory failure requiring support with mechanical ventilation occurs with an incidence of 77-100 per 100,000 person-years and accounts for half of all patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Major causes of acute respiratory failure include pneumonia, asthma, emphysema, and acute lung injury. These causes of acute respiratory failure may result in partial lung collapse (atelectasis), and airway narrowing (bronchoconstriction)that result in decreased oxygen levels requiring support with the ventilator. The prolonged inactivity in the supine position associated with mechanical ventilation can further result in atelectasis requiring increased oxygen supplementation through the ventilator.

The current standard of care in acute respiratory failure is a strategy of mechanical ventilation using a single lung volume delivered repeatedly. However, the current standard mechanical ventilation strategy is not consistent with the variability in respiration of healthy humans and has been shown to contribute to increased lung injury in some studies. The mortality associated with acute respiratory failure is high, 30-40%. Thus, improvements in mechanical ventilation strategies that improve oxygen levels and potentially decrease further lung injury delivered by the ventilator are warranted.

Recent studies by BU Professor Bela Suki and others in humans and animals with acute lung injury, bronchoconstriction, and atelectasis have shown that varying the lung volumes delivered by a ventilator significantly decreases biomarkers of lung injury, improves lung mechanics, and increases oxygenation when compared to identical mean volumes of conventional, monotonous low lung volume ventilation.

Therefore, we propose a first-in-human, Phase I study to evaluate the safety of this novel mode of ventilation, Variable Ventilation, during acute respiratory failure

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Device Feasibility
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

The occurrence of adverse events in the use of variable ventilation versus conventional ventilation, including the loss of any of the following (1) hemodynamic stability, (2) respiratory stability,(3) acid-base stability, and (4) neurological stability.

时间窗: Up to 24 hours after the end of the study period

次要结局

  • Oxygenation(3 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Allan J. Walkey

BMC Attending Physician

Boston Medical Center

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验