ELR Monitoring Against Permanent Pacemaker in Atrial Fibrillation
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Registration Number
- NCT02506621
- Lead Sponsor
- Eastbourne General Hospital
- Brief Summary
Randomised crossover study comparing the sensitivity and specificity of 5 External loop recorders in detecting pacemaker detected Atrial fibrillation burden.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of the study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the ZIO xt , MoMe, TECHNOMED pocket ECG and Nuubo to the R-test, our current standard clinical practice, in detection of AF burden, in patients with history of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and have a dual chamber pacemaker or ICD in situ, with sensitivity and specificity of AF detection calculated from the implanted pacemaker monitored beat to beat holters.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- History of Atrial Fibrillation
- Dual chamber pacemaker with advanced holter arrhythmia diagnostics
- Previous AV node ablation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Sensitivity and specificity in detection of pacemaker detected AF burden in comparison to R-test 14 weeks Sensitivity and specificity of ZIO xt patch, MoMe, TECHNOMED pocket ECG AND Nuubo in detection of pacemaker detected AF burden in comparison to R-test.
Sensitivity and sepcificity will be determined by the percentage of pacemaker detected AF episodes that have been detected by each ELR device.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cost effectiveness in detection of arrhythmias in comparison to R-test 14 weeks Cost-effectiveness of ZIO xt patch, MoMe, TECHNOMED pocket ECG and Nuubo in detection of arrhythmia in comparison to R-Test
proportion of pacemaker detected tachyarrhythmias detected in comparison to R-test 14 weeks Proportion of pacemaker detected tachyarrhythmias detected by the ZIO xt patch, MoMe, TECHNOMED pocket ECG and Nuubo in comparison to R-test
Total wear time in comparison to R-test 14 weeks Total wear time of the ZIO xt patch, MoMe, TECHNOMED pocket ECG and Nuubo in comparison to R-test
Proportion of symptomatic arrhythmias detected in comparison to R-test 14 weeks Proportion of symptoms secondary to arrhythmias detected by the ZIO xt patch, MoMe, TECHNOMED pocket ECG and Nuubo compared to R-Test