MedPath

Computer Navigation-assisted Surgery for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Rectal Cancer
Interventions
Device: Computer-assisted navigation surgery
Registration Number
NCT04512937
Lead Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate feasibility of computer navigation-assisted surgery in particularly difficult cases of locally advanced (LARC) and recurrent (LRRC) rectal cancer where the standard surgical strategy is expected to result in incomplete tumour removal. The investigators hypothesize that computer navigation-assisted surgery can facilitate improved anatomic orientation in the pelvis enabling tumour removal with free margins in these cases.

Detailed Description

Curative treatment of rectal cancer requires surgical removal of the tumour. The key challenge in this surgery is to remove the tumour with free margins - R0 resection. Failure to achieve R0 resection often leads to recurrence, which is associated with risk of long-term suffering, poor quality of life and death for the patients. Achieving R0 resection is most difficult in advanced rectal cancer cases, where the tumour is threatening - and sometimes even growing into - neighbouring organs.

Computer navigation-assisted surgery has typically been implemented where extreme surgical precision is necessary or in surgical fields with high anatomic complexity. In such settings, it contributes to preservation of vital anatomic structures close to the tumour, and ensures completeness of resection in cases of malignant disease.

With this in mind, feasibility of navigation in surgically challenging rectal cancer cases will be investigated in this study. If found feasible, navigation could improve surgical management for patients who otherwise would not have the possibility of cure.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with LARC or LRRC (either biopsy verified, or demonstrated on MRI and confirmed by the MDT decision)
  • The MDT must deem standard surgical strategy at high risk of resulting in R1/R2 resection and computer-assisted navigation likely to improve the chances of obtaining R0 resection.
  • Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Non-adenocarcinoma malignancies.
  • Unresectable distant metastatic disease or unresectable synchronous other malignancy
  • Patients deemed unfit to participation according to the MDT.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
All patientsComputer-assisted navigation surgeryAll patients will be subjects to the intervention of computer navigation-assisted surgery
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of patients with R0 resection2 years

Resection status will be determined by histopathological examination of specimen

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of whether pre-procedural plan was executed during surgery by comparing pre- and post-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).2 years

Postoperative MRI of the pelvis will be examined and compared to preoperative MRI to evaluate what structures were removed at surgery.

Assessment of whether pre-procedural plan was executed by comparing volume of intended resection with volume of resected specimen.2 years

Volume of intended resection (measured in millilitres) based on pre-procedural MRI will be comparted with volume of resected specimen (measured in millilitres).

Assessment of surgeons' opinion on benefit of computer navigation through qualitative interviews.2 years

Interviews with the surgeons will be semi-structured based on an interview guide. They will be recorded and transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Progression-free survivial (PFS)5 years

PFS is defined as time from surgery until disease progression or death from any cause

Occurrence of 30 day morbidity and mortality assessed with the Accordion severity grading system of surgical complications30 days after surgery

The Accordion severity grading system of surgical complications classifies surgical complications in 6 Levels ranging from mild complications (1) to Death (6)

Assessment of patients quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)3 years

The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions) registering five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. EORTC QLQ C30 will be completed prior to surgery, and at one and three years after surgery. Changes over time will be analysed.

Overall survival (OS)5 years

OS is defined as time from surgery until death from any cause

Rate of local (re-)recurrence after surgery5 years

Local (re)-recurrence will be determined by routine follow-up

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Oslo University Hospital- The Norwegian Radium Hospital

🇳🇴

Oslo, Norway

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath