Is an Integrated Care Pathway for Adolescents With Depression More Effective Than Treatment as Usual? A Controlled Clinical Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- ICP1
- Sponsor
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
- Enrollment
- 60
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in Childhood Depression Rating Scale-Revised scores
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Major Depressive Disorder in adolescence is prevalent and debilitating. Our group aims to improve treatment response through the use of an Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) based on a high quality Clinical Practice Guideline and measurement-based care (MBC; where periodic symptom scale scores are used to make treatment decisions). We propose a controlled clinical trial comparing ICP to treatment-as-usual (TAU) across two sites.
Detailed Description
Background: There is a gap between what is known from the evidence about the treatment of adolescent depression and what is practiced. Moreover, while there is evidence that measurement-based care can improve outcomes for adults with various mental health conditions, there is limited information on this framework in adolescent depression. Objective: Our study aims to enhance the implementation of evidence-based care (using the NICE Clinical Practice Guidelines as a template) combined wtih measurement-based care through the use of an Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) in adolescents with depression. Hypothesis: As this is a pilot study, our hypotheses centre around feasibility. We hypothesize that: (1) we will recruit at least 30 participants to the ICP treatment arm and 30 participants at the "treatment-as-usual" arm at a different site (2) that baseline measures will be fully completed by 95% of adolescents recruited, (3) that baseline measures will take 2 hours to complete for adolescents and 1 hour to complete for caregivers, (4) that a mean of 90% of the key aspects of the treatment protocol are followed in the ICP group (5) that 80% of participants recruited will complete measures at the end of the 20-week interval and that (6) 90% of the youth, caregivers and clinicians who partake int eh study will attend a focus group to provide qualitative feedback on their experience. Design: This is a non-randomized controlled clinical trial. Randomizing at the individual level is not possible - the intervention is implemented at the clinic level; so the effect of the intervention on one youth within a clinic would influence the care of other youth at the clinic. Sampling: Participants are recruited from psychiatric clinics at 2 sites. Each site will recruit to their respective treatment arm.
Investigators
Darren Courtney
Principle Investigator
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Psychiatrist's impression is that depression is a primary psychiatric. concern
- •14-18 years old.
- •DSM-5 criteria for Major Depressive Disorder or Persistent Depressive Disorder as per the Diagnostic Interview for Affective Symptoms for Children (DIAS-C19).
- •Speak, read and write English at a grade 6 level.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Threshold psychotic symptoms.
- •Bipolar disorder.
- •Moderate-to-severe substance use disorder.
- •Autistic spectrum disorder or intellectual disability.
- •Eating disorder.
- •Suicide-related behaviours requiring acute intervention.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in Childhood Depression Rating Scale-Revised scores
Time Frame: 20 weeks
The CDRS-R is a 17-item measure rated by an evaluator after a semi-structured interview with the adolescent relating to symptoms of depression over the past 2 weeks. Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of over 55 interpreted as a moderate to severe rating. Lower values represent a better outcome.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Children And Youth(20 weeks)
- Change in Childhood Behaviour Checklist(20 weeks)