CTRI/2023/05/052514
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Midazolam vs dexmedetomidine nebulization as adjuvant to lignocaine a comparative study during awake flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy
AIIMS Patna0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- AIIMS Patna
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age 18 to 60 years
- •Scheduled for elective bronchoscopy procedure(Diagnostic \& therapeutic)
Exclusion Criteria
- •Unconscious and uncooperative patients
- •Intubated patient on ventilator,
- •patient need general anaesthesia
- •Patient on oxygen
- •Coagulation abnormalities
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A study to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation of mechanically ventilated children.Health Condition 1: Z991- Dependence on respiratorCTRI/2021/03/031988Dr Mrinmayee Deshmukh
Recruiting
Phase 2
Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam Nebulization as Sedation During Cesarean Delivery in Pre-eclampsiaProcedural SedationNCT04873596Zagazig University94
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of the drugs nasal Dexmedetomine and oral Midazolam for decreasing preoperative anxiety in children and their effect on post-operative recovery.CTRI/2017/03/008110Dr Neerja Bhardwaj100
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Medication used for sedation in mechanically ventilated childreHealth Condition 1: null- Children aged â?¤ 12 years admitted in PICU for mechanical ventilation with anticipated to require sedation for more than 24 hours.CTRI/2016/05/006925Director JIPMER430
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine with Midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated children in Pediatric intensive care unit.CTRI/2020/02/023636AIIMS Raipur