MedPath

Do Clinicians Want Recommendations?

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Healthy Individuals (Clinicians)
Interventions
Other: Evidence summary alone plus a recommendation
Other: Evidence summary alone
Registration Number
NCT02006017
Lead Sponsor
McMaster University
Brief Summary

The use of the best evidence available for decision-making is nowadays an undisputed goal in health care. However, this is not always achieved in the context of clinical practice. Two of the potential solutions to bridge the gap between evidence and the clinical practice are the "evidence summaries" and the "evidence based recommendations". However, it is not clear, and frequently controversial, to what extent clinicians consider helpful recommendations accompanying evidence summaries. The investigators will explore this question by conducting a study where clinicians will be randomized to receive a clinical scenario accompanied by an evidence summary plus a recommendation and a second clinical scenario accompanied by only for an evidence summary (group A) or vice versa (Group B). The outcome will be clinicians' preferences.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
467
Inclusion Criteria
  • Were trained as Medical Doctors
  • Practice primary care or general internal medicine.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria

none

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group BEvidence summary aloneWe will present to participants two general clinical scenarios. The first scenario will be accompanied by an evidence summary alone and a second scenario will be accompanied by an evidence summary plus a recommendation
Group AEvidence summary alone plus a recommendationWe will present to participants two general clinical scenarios. The first scenario will be accompanied by an evidence summary plus a recommendation and a second scenario will be accompanied by an evidence summary alone
Group AEvidence summary aloneWe will present to participants two general clinical scenarios. The first scenario will be accompanied by an evidence summary plus a recommendation and a second scenario will be accompanied by an evidence summary alone
Group BEvidence summary alone plus a recommendationWe will present to participants two general clinical scenarios. The first scenario will be accompanied by an evidence summary alone and a second scenario will be accompanied by an evidence summary plus a recommendation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
PreferencesImmediately after the intervention (Survey)

Preference: for the evidence summary plus the accompanying recommendation or for the evidence summary alone. We will assess this outcome with a 7-point Lickert scale This outcome will be assessed after the presentation of the two clinical scenarios.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Interpretation of benefits and harmsImmediately after the intervention (Survey)

Interpretation of benefits and harms: Distribution of the interpretation of the magnitude of the benefits in comparison with harms

UnderstandingImmediately after the intervention (Survey)

Understanding: Percentage of correct answers regarding the understanding of the evidence: understanding of baseline risk, risk difference, confidence interval and quality of the evidence assessment.

Intended course of actionImmediately after the intervention (Survey)

Intended course of action: For the clinical questions related with strong recommendations, we will compare the percentage of appropriate decisions (i.e. decisions that match the strong recommendation).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

McMaster University

🇨🇦

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath