Emergent Bilinguals: the Relationship Between Child Language Proficiency and Language of Treatment on the Outcomes Children with Developmental Language Disorder
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- University of Houston
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Accuracy on elicited production probes (conditional or nominal)
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Of the 12 million children in the USA growing up bilingual, about 1 million experience Developmental Language Disorder (DLD), a disorder in language learning and use. Currently there is no guidance for speech language pathologists (SLPs) as to the language of intervention for emergent Spanish-English bilingual children with DLD. This project will examine the relationship between language proficiency and the language of intervention, considering monolingual intervention (Spanish or English) and interleaved Spanish-English intervention with the goal of improving language outcomes and thereby strengthening long-term academic achievement
Detailed Description
More than 8.5 million children in the USA speak Spanish at home (U.S. Census Table S1601, 2020) with about a half million experiencing Developmental Language Disorder (DLD), a disorder in language learning and use not attributed to limited language exposure, autism, intellectual disability, etc. (Norbury et al., 2016). Bilingual children with DLD experience language-learning difficulties in both languages, including documented difficulty with complex syntax (Gutiérrez-Clellen, 1998; Jasso et al., under review). While it is self-evident that a monolingual child should be treated in their first language, currently there is no guidance for speech-language pathologists as to the language of intervention for bilingual children (Kohnert, et al., 2005). This is exacerbated by the fact that DLD varies in severity and bilingualism exists across a continuum, ranging from nearly monolingual in either language A or B to balanced bilingualism with good fluency in both languages. Furthermore, children who enter school with only limited proficiency in the majority language (e.g., English) rapidly become more proficient. This continuum is exemplified in our data. Recast therapy, an evidence-based intervention for grammatical difficulties (Cleave et al., 2015), is thought to work via mechanisms similar to priming (Leonard, 2011). Critically, cross-linguistic priming in bilingual children depends on proficiency (Vasilyeva et al., 2010) suggesting a need to align recast therapy with the child's proficiency profile (Gutiérrez-Clellen et al., 2012).
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Crossover
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 4 Years to 6 Years (Child)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •parent concerns and/or a history of receiving services in the public schools
- •age-specific cutoffs for the morphosyntax subtests for their best language (English or Spanish) on the Bilingual English Spanish Assessment. The cut-off score for best language for 4-year-olds is 84, for 5-year-olds is 85, and for 6-year-olds is
- •Using the best-language approach, these scores have a sensitivity over 90% and specificity over 80% for children between 4;0 and 6;11 years of age , which is considered acceptable for studies of diagnostic accuracy.
- •nonverbal IQ, as measured by the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-2, matrices subtest, will be at or above a standard score of
- •pass a hearing screening test
- •participants must be emergent bilingual, that is children must be producing at least simple sentences in spontaneous speech in either Spanish or English and be exposed to both langauges
- •participants must be able to benefit from treatment for both conditional adverbial clauses and complement clauses, as evidenced by accuracy below 40% on 10-item elicited production probes in both languages
Exclusion Criteria
- •children with significant sensory-motor concerns or psychiatric disorders per parent report will not be enrolled.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Accuracy on elicited production probes (conditional or nominal)
Time Frame: ~1 month before (Pre), 2 weeks before second structure (Mid) and 2 weeks after treatment (Post test)]
Accuracy on elicited production probes are the primary outcome measure. There are 40 probes in total. Ten for Spanish conditionals, ten English conditionals, ten Spanish complement clauses and ten English complement clauses.
Secondary Outcomes
- Mean Length of Utterance and Subordination Index in English(~1 month before (Pre), 2 weeks before second structure (Mid) and 2 weeks after treatment (Post test)])