Does the use of video improve patient satisfaction in the consent process for local-anaesthetic urological procedures?
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Urological and Genital Diseases
- Registration Number
- PACTR202010744878665
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Urology University of Cape Town
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 54
Inclusion Criteria
Patients enrolled were required to be:
Older than 18 years of age
Able to watch a video
Able to speak at least one of the following three languages: English, isiXhosa and Afrikaans.
Illiterate patients could be included: a doctor or nurse in the urology team was available to read the relevant documentation to these patients.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients without the capacity to give informed consent were excluded.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient satisfaction with portable video media versus standard verbal consent
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Benefit of patient information leaflets as an adjunct to portable video media;Whether portable video media improved patient understanding of the procedure they were due to undergo