跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2026/04/107234
CTRI/2026/04/107234尚未招募1/2 期

Comparing the accuracy of CAD-CAM (computer aided design computer aided manufacturing) printed surgical guide vs a conventional thermoplastic surgical guide using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)- An in vivo study

Dr hritika gawande1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2026年4月15日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
1/2 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
20
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of implant placement using CAD CAM printed surgical guide and a conventional thermoplastic surgical guide using cone beam computed tomography.

  The objective is:

·      To determine the dimensional deviations in the planned and placed implant position using a conventional thermoplastic surgical guide.

·      To determine the dimensional deviations in the planned and placed implant position using a 3D CAD-CAM printed guide template.

To compare the accuracy of implant placement by a conventional thermoplastic surgical guide to a CAD-CAM printed surgical guide using cone beam computed tomography

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
盲法
Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 90.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Adult patients (18 years and above).
  • Systemically and periodontally healthy.
  • Edentulous sites with intact adjacent teeth in maxillary anterior and premolar region.
  • Patients consenting for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning as part of treatment planning.

排除标准

  • The presence of active periodontal disease and medical conditions that are contraindicated for implant therapy.

研究者

发起方
Dr hritika gawande
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Hritika Gawande

Government college of dentistry indore

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验