Comparing the accuracy of CAD-CAM (computer aided design computer aided manufacturing) printed surgical guide vs a conventional thermoplastic surgical guide using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)- An in vivo study
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 20
- Locations
- 1
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of implant placement using CAD CAM printed surgical guide and a conventional thermoplastic surgical guide using cone beam computed tomography.
The objective is:
· To determine the dimensional deviations in the planned and placed implant position using a conventional thermoplastic surgical guide.
· To determine the dimensional deviations in the planned and placed implant position using a 3D CAD-CAM printed guide template.
To compare the accuracy of implant placement by a conventional thermoplastic surgical guide to a CAD-CAM printed surgical guide using cone beam computed tomography
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- Masking
- Outcome Assessor Blinded
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18.00 Year(s) to 90.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adult patients (18 years and above).
- •Systemically and periodontally healthy.
- •Edentulous sites with intact adjacent teeth in maxillary anterior and premolar region.
- •Patients consenting for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning as part of treatment planning.
Exclusion Criteria
- •The presence of active periodontal disease and medical conditions that are contraindicated for implant therapy.
Investigators
Dr Hritika Gawande
Government college of dentistry indore
