MedPath

A clinical trial to study two drugs dexmedetomedine and ketamine in small doses in removing procedural discomfort during spinal anaesthesia

Completed
Conditions
American society of anaesthesiologists class 1
Registration Number
CTRI/2015/06/005888
Lead Sponsor
Mahatma Gandhi medical college and research institute
Brief Summary

Subanaesthetic doses of  Ketamine has been tried for procedural sedation in the past.1, 2 Dexmedetomidine is increasingly used as a sedative drug for procedural sedation in various surgeries in recent times.3.4 There are no studies in literature comparing ketamine and dexmedetomedine  for allaying procedural discomfort. So we would like to compare the efficacy of dexmeditomedine and  subanaesthetic dose of ketamine in allaying procedural discomfort during establishment of subarachnoid block

  Aims and objectives; To compare the efficacy of dexmeditomedine and  subanaesthetic dose of ketamine in allaying procedural discomfort during establishment of subarachnoid block with regard to 1. Degree of sedation, 2. Ease of positioning, 3. Prick response 3. Time interval between study drug injection and response to verbal commands 4. Complications 5. Recall of procedure, 6. Patient satisfaction

hypothesis: **dexmeditomedine is better than  subanaesthetic dose of ketamine in allaying procedural discomfort during establishment of subarachnoid block**

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Willingness.
  • ASA 1 & 2 physical status.
  • Age 18 to 50 years.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Allergic to drugs used.
  • Psychiatric disorder.
  • Patients on beta blocker therapy.
  • Contraindicated to SAB.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1. Degree of sedation1. during subarachnoid block look for prick response | 2. level of sedation while patient is positioned for subarachnoid block | 3. recall of spinal procedure at the end of surgery | 4. verbal response time after sedation | 5. satisfaction at the end of surgery | 6. ease of positioning after Subarachnoid block
2. Ease of positioning1. during subarachnoid block look for prick response | 2. level of sedation while patient is positioned for subarachnoid block | 3. recall of spinal procedure at the end of surgery | 4. verbal response time after sedation | 5. satisfaction at the end of surgery | 6. ease of positioning after Subarachnoid block
3. Prick response1. during subarachnoid block look for prick response | 2. level of sedation while patient is positioned for subarachnoid block | 3. recall of spinal procedure at the end of surgery | 4. verbal response time after sedation | 5. satisfaction at the end of surgery | 6. ease of positioning after Subarachnoid block
4.Time interval between study drug injection and response to verbal commands1. during subarachnoid block look for prick response | 2. level of sedation while patient is positioned for subarachnoid block | 3. recall of spinal procedure at the end of surgery | 4. verbal response time after sedation | 5. satisfaction at the end of surgery | 6. ease of positioning after Subarachnoid block
5. Recall of procedure1. during subarachnoid block look for prick response | 2. level of sedation while patient is positioned for subarachnoid block | 3. recall of spinal procedure at the end of surgery | 4. verbal response time after sedation | 5. satisfaction at the end of surgery | 6. ease of positioning after Subarachnoid block
6. Patient satisfaction1. during subarachnoid block look for prick response | 2. level of sedation while patient is positioned for subarachnoid block | 3. recall of spinal procedure at the end of surgery | 4. verbal response time after sedation | 5. satisfaction at the end of surgery | 6. ease of positioning after Subarachnoid block
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1. complications2. hemodynamic variation from drug administraion to patient positioning after subarachnoid block

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute

🇮🇳

Pondicherry, PONDICHERRY, India

Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute
🇮🇳Pondicherry, PONDICHERRY, India
Hemanth Kumar VR
Principal investigator
9003550553
drvrhk@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.