Comparison of accuracy in measurement of wrist range of motion between gyroscopes and standard goniometer

Phase 1

Completed

• Conditions: The aim of this study was to prove the accuracy of the gyroscopic MEMS devices for active wrist joint range of motion compared with standard goniometer; Gyroscopic MEMS, standard goniometer, gyroscopic application ,active wrist joint range of motion

• Registration Number: TCTR20220110006
• Lead Sponsor: Maha Vajiralongkorn foundation

Brief Summary

Average measurements from the three approaches had within 1.5 degrees of differences from each other, for all of the movements. Both the developed IMU glove and smartphone device showed excellent correlation to the goniometer in most of the movements, with ICC between 0.914 to 0.961 and 0.929 and 0.951, respectively.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Completion: 2018-09-17
• Study Start: 2022-01-10
• Last Update Posted: 19 August 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 20

Inclusion Criteria

age 18-60 year-old without previous history of surgery, post-traumatic event, musculoskeletal disease, neurovascular problem or movement disorder of both wrist, forearm and elbow.

Exclusion Criteria

age 18-60 year-old with previous history of surgery, post-traumatic event, musculoskeletal disease, neurovascular problem or movement disorder of both wrist, forearm and elbow, age below 18 and above 60 year old

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Degree of wrist range of motion 3 years Three method using gyroscopic MEMS devices was compared gyroscopic application in smartphone and goniometer to evaluate wrist ROM by orthopedic staff, orthopedic resident and medical student.