Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04459481
NCT04459481
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of Two Bending Angles for Nasotracheal Intubation With a Malleable Vedio Stylet

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences1 site in 1 country98 target enrollmentJune 4, 2020

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Intubation;Difficult
Sponsor
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Enrollment
98
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Success rate of nasotracheal intubation
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Video intubating stylet can be safely and effectively used for nasotracheal intubation, but the optimal bending angle is still unknown. In this study, the optimal bending angle will be determined by comparing the intubation time and success rate of nasotracheal intubation with video intubating stylet at two different bending angles.

Detailed Description

intubation will be accomplished at 70 bending angle and 90 degrees bending angle in each group. intubation time, success rate, additional manoeuvres and epistaxis will be recorded and compared.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 4, 2020
End Date
November 5, 2020
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Juhui Liu

Plastic Surgery Hospital

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients require nasotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

  • fixed, or limited, neck movement, obstructive sleep apnoea, bilateral nasal obstruction or patients with an abnormal coagulation status

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Success rate of nasotracheal intubation

Time Frame: Procedure (From the beginning of intubation to the end of intubation)

The percentage of successful nasotracheal intubation

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials