MedPath

Comparison of Two Bending Angles for Nasotracheal Intubation With a Malleable Vedio Stylet

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Intubation;Difficult
Interventions
Device: bending angle
Registration Number
NCT04459481
Lead Sponsor
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

Video intubating stylet can be safely and effectively used for nasotracheal intubation, but the optimal bending angle is still unknown. In this study, the optimal bending angle will be determined by comparing the intubation time and success rate of nasotracheal intubation with video intubating stylet at two different bending angles.

Detailed Description

intubation will be accomplished at 70 bending angle and 90 degrees bending angle in each group. intubation time, success rate, additional manoeuvres and epistaxis will be recorded and compared.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
98
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients require nasotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
  • fixed, or limited, neck movement, obstructive sleep apnoea, bilateral nasal obstruction or patients with an abnormal coagulation status

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
70-degree bending angle groupbending angleintubation with a 70-degree bending angle
90-degree bending angle groupbending angleintubation with a 90-degree bending angle
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Success rate of nasotracheal intubationProcedure (From the beginning of intubation to the end of intubation)

The percentage of successful nasotracheal intubation

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

ChineseAMS

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath