A randomised trial to study the effect of precut techniques as primary modality on post ERC pancreatitis (PEP) rate among those who come under high risk for PEP
- Conditions
- Obstruction of bile duct,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/02/031004
- Lead Sponsor
- PGIMER
- Brief Summary
Post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and worrisome complication of ERCP with an incidence ranging from 3.5-9.7%. Among the high-risk group for PEP the incidence reported is around 14.7%. As per ESGE guidelines 2020 a patient is considered to be high risk for PEP in presence of at least 1 definite or 2 likely patient /procedure related risk factors. A recent multicenter randomized trial has shown very good efficacy and safety of primary precut fistulotomy in high risk cohort for PEP. Another randomized trial compared very early precut papillotomy (PP) with primary PP. The primary PP group had only 1 case of PEP (0.67%), suggesting good safety of the primary PP approach, although the very early group had PEP rate of 5.2%, same as has been reported in standard cannulation. In the second study the PP was done in average risk patients and even among them the PEP rate in the very early group was 5.2%. We do not know what is role of primary PP in high risk cohort for PEP, hence, we planned this randomized trial to compare the effect of primary PP with primary PF on PEP rate in high risk cohort for PEP.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 324
Patients undergoing ERC and come under high risk group for development of PEP will be randomised into either primary precut fistulotomy or paplillotomy groups.
1-Previous sphincterotomy 2-Severe coagulopathy (INR>1.5) 3-Suspected periampullary growth 4-Distorted anatomy-Billroth II surgery 5-Small flat papilla 6-Periampullary diverticulum other than type III 7-Pancreatitis (Acute/chronic) 8- Unwilling to give informed consent.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the effect of primary PP with primary PF on PEP rate in high risk cohort for PEP 1 day
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1-Compare the success rate of selective biliary cannulation (SBC) 2-Compare the rate of other ERC related complications
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
PGIMER
🇮🇳Chandigarh, CHANDIGARH, India
PGIMER🇮🇳Chandigarh, CHANDIGARH, IndiaHarshal S MandavdharePrincipal investigator9592814877hmandavdhare760@gmail.com