Evaluation of Efficacy and Cost of Two Monitoring Strategies for Public Clinical Research - OPTIMON: Optimisation of Monitoring for Clinical Research Studies
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Enrollment
- 1800
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Proportion of patients' file without severe error.
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 15 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
OPTIMON will compare the efficacy and the cost of two monitoring strategies: one based on the classic standards of quality assurance, and the other one being a priori "optimized" on the main scientific and regulatory principles.
Detailed Description
There is no validated standard of monitoring strategy for clinical research studies. Optimon will compare two monitoring strategies - a classical strategy based on the practices of the pharmaceutical industry, and an optimized strategy based on patient's risk level - on their ability to produce exact data, focusing on the main quality criteria: regulatory requirements and scientific validity of results. Optimon is a non inferiority randomized trial.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Clinical Research Studies: risk level A, B, or C in the Optimon risk-assessment scale, with or without a sponsor and the advice of an ethical committee, starting in 2008 and ending before the end of 2010, with a foreseen accrual of 20 patients or more, multicentric with at least 4 clinical sites, with a paper or electronic CRF, with the participating agreement of the coordinating investigator and the sponsor.
- •Clinical sites: Sites with a foreseen accrual of 5 patients at least, with the participating agreement of the principal investigator.
- •Clinical Research Units: with the label of an institution, with at least 2 years of experience in multicentric studies, with SOPs finalized before 2008, willing to participate in Optimon.
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Proportion of patients' file without severe error.
Time Frame: at end of follow-up
Secondary Outcomes
- Compounds of the main outcome, other errors, delay to get the results, costs(at end of follow-up)