跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03709095
NCT03709095已完成不适用

Sprint Interval Training During Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury

McMaster University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2017年6月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
20
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change in peak power output

研究概览

简要总结

Immediately following a spinal cord injury (SCI), patients are admitted to inpatient rehabilitation where they undergo physical reconditioning in preparation for a return to home setting. The current standard of practice for aerobic training is performing arm-ergometry for 25 mins at a frequency of three times per week. Given the move towards shortened length of stay during inpatient rehabilitation, performing MICT can consume a considerable amount of therapy time. Sprint interval training (SIT) has been shown to elicit similar improvements in physical capacity, despite a reduced time commitment to MICT. However, there are no controlled trials comparing the effects of SIT to MICT in individuals with SCI undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a five-week, thrice weekly 10 min SIT program and compare outcome measures to a traditional 25 minute MICT program on the arm-ergometer in individuals with SCI undergoing inpatient clinical rehabilitation. It was hypothesized that five weeks of SIT and MICT would induce similar changes in maximal and sub-maximal exercise performance, self-efficacy for exercise, and exercise enjoyment, despite large differences in training volume and time commitment. It was also hypothesized that SIT would be well tolerated and elicit higher levels of cardiovascular strain than MICT.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Participants with sub-acute spinal cord injury (time since injury: 14 - 182 days)
  • Undergoing inpatient rehabilitation
  • Aged 18-65 years
  • Injury level at the second cervical vertebrae (C2) or below

排除标准

  • Unable to perform arm-ergometry training

研究组 & 干预措施

Moderate Intensity Continuous Training

Active Comparator

Training was performed three times a week for five weeks. Each session began with a 2 minute warm up, and concluded with a 3 minute cool down. Following the warm-up, participants performed 20 minutes of arm cycling at a self-selected cadence at 45-65% of their peak power output. Total training duration was 25 mins.

干预措施: moderate intensity continuous training (Other)

Sprint Interval Training

Experimental

The SIT protocol was adopted from Gillen and colleagues (See Ref), and consisted of 3 x 20 second "all-out" efforts at ≥ 100% of an individuals peak power output. Each sprint was interspersed by 120 seconds of active recovery at 10% of an individuals peak power output. Total training duration was 10 mins.

干预措施: Sprint interval training (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Change in peak power output

时间窗: Change in peak power output from baseline to 5 weeks

maximum amount of power produced during a graded exercise test on the arm-ergometer

Change in sub-maximal arm-ergometry

时间窗: Change in sub-maximal arm-ergometry from baseline to 5 weeks

Participants performed three 5-minute steady state workloads on the arm-ergometer at power outputs corresponding to RPE's of 8, 10 and 12. Participants were given a minimum of 2 minutes, and a maximum of 5 minutes of rest in between each workload.

次要结局

  • Cardiovascular Responses(Throughout each week of training (Week 1,Week 2, Week 3, Week4, Week 5))
  • Perceptual Responses(Throughout each week of training (Week 1,Week 2, Week 3, Week4, Week 5))
  • Change in self-efficacy for exercise(Change in self-efficacy from baseline to 5 weeks)
  • Exercise Satisfaction(Measured only at the end of the intervention (5 weeks))
  • Pain perceptions(Measured only at the end of the intervention (5 weeks))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验