Comparison of PENG block and lumbar plexus block in terms ofpostoperative analgesia and mobilization for fast track primary hiparthroplasty
Phase 1
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Total Hip ArthroplastyTherapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Musculoskeletal Diseases [C05]
- Registration Number
- CTIS2023-507506-14-01
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospital Del Mar
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 64
Inclusion Criteria
Patients scheduled for primary hip replacement who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
Refusal to participate in the study, blood coagulation dysfunction, Neuropathies, Punction site or systemic infections, Local anesthestic alergies, Women of reproductive age without contraceptive control, maternity or breastfeeding
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Main Objective: To compare two regional anaesthesia techniques for primary hip<br>replacement in terms of pain relief and muscular strength of the<br>quadriceps;Secondary Objective: To compare lenght of hospital stay, To compare patient mobilization, To compare pain experience, To compare incidence of adverse effects;Primary end point(s): Pain, Quadriceps muscular strength
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Secondary end point(s):Adverse effects: Nausea, vomiting, sedation, toxicity, others;Secondary end point(s):Opioid consumption;Secondary end point(s):Need for additional analgesia;Secondary end point(s):Length of hospital stay;Secondary end point(s):Pain experience