Implant Retained Overdenture VERSUS Implant Canine Retained Overdenture.

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Oral Health Impact Profile Short Version 14 (OHIP 14)

• Registration Number: NCT07046104
• Lead Sponsor: Mansoura University

Brief Summary

ABSTRACT Background: mandibular class 1 modification 1 RPD can be retained by mesially placed implant only, or canines can be used to share in retention using telescopic attachment. So, the aim of this clinical study is to evaluate patient satisfaction and oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) for implant retained Overdenture versus implant-tooth retained Overdenture.

Methods: This clinical cross-over study included 10 partially edentulous patients with only remaining mandibular canines. Every patient received two mandibular implants at the 1st premolar region. Two mandibular implant retained overdenture will be constructed, opposing a maxillary single denture. One of the dentures was made with a design based on implant retention only but the other denture was made with dual implant-tooth retention design. The effects of each overdenture design were evaluated after 3 months. patients indicated satisfaction with their prosthesis using a visual analog scale (VAS)Regarding VAS, participants were asked to score their answer according to the amount of satisfaction on a 100 mm line (Score 0 = no satisfaction at all and score 100 = complete satisfaction). The questions cover several items related to overdentures such as retention, stability, comfort, ease of cleaning, ease of speaking, ease of chewing, limited activities due to embarrassment, quality of bolus, and appearance. , and oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) was recorded for both prostheses. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was done to compare the statistically significant difference between the two groups. SPSS ver.23. P \<.05 was considered significant.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2023-01
• Study Start: 2023-01-12
• Primary Completion: 2024-07-07
• Study Completion: 2024-08-07
• Study First Submitted: 2025-01-10
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-06-30
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-06-30
• Study First Posted: 2025-07-01
• Last Update Posted: 2025-07-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 10

Inclusion Criteria

• This research will be done on patients who were previously received 2 mesially placed implants in the 1st premolar region with only two remaining mandibular canines with opposing maxillary single denture

Exclusion Criteria

• uncontrolled diabetic patients

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: CROSSOVER

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
patients indicated satisfaction with their prosthesis using a visual analog scale (VAS)	3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) was recorded for both prostheses.	3 months

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Basmsa; 🇪🇬 Mansoura, Egypt