Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01464996
NCT01464996CompletedNot Applicable

Clinical Evaluation Of A New Two-Component Self-Etch Universal Adhesive (OptiBond XTR)

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill2 sites in 1 country24 target enrollmentStarted: December 2011Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
24
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Retention

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This randomized clinical trial evaluates the clinical performance of a new two-component self-etch universal adhesive, OptiBond XTR, when applied in non-carious Class V cervical lesions without macromechanical retention (retentive grooves or bevels). The control material is OptiBond FL, a "traditional" etch/prime/bond adhesive with documented clinical performance. Eighty non-carious Class V cervical lesions are divided into two groups to be treated with either OptiBond XTR or OptiBond FL. Both adhesives are applied strictly according to the manufacturer's directions. Herculite Ultra, a nano-hybrid resin-based composite, is used as the restorative material with both adhesives. The restorations will be evaluated at insertion (baseline), 6 months, and 18 months. An optional three-year recall evaluation is also proposed. The investigators hypothesize that both adhesives will have comparable performance.

Detailed Description

CLINICAL RESEARCH PLAN

Introduction

This randomized clinical trial involved the restoration and evaluation of 83 (target enrollment was 80) non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using either the new two-component self-etch universal adhesive OptiBond XTR or a control dental adhesive, OptiBond FL, and a nano-hybrid composite restorative material, Herculite Ultra. OptiBond XTR is a two-component self-etch, filled, fluoride releasing, light-cured bonding agent designed for the universal bonding of direct and indirect restorations. The study design was based on the American Dental Association Acceptance Program Guidelines for Dentin and Enamel Adhesive Materials.

Participant Selection Criteria

Participants were selected on the basis of requiring restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. Participants with fewer than 20 teeth were not considered. The participant pool was randomized as much as possible to exclude bias due to age (18 to 80 years old), sex, race, national origin, or other factors such as unusual dietary, habitual, or oral hygiene factors which might affect the results. If the participant pool included these effects, they will be acknowledged in all project reports. Despite our efforts to have close to equal numbers of men and women in the study (ADA Guidelines, 2001), as noted in this report our pool was imbalanced towards women (we enrolled 20 females and 4 males). However, we do not believe this gender imbalance will affect or bias the results.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects needing restoration of NCCLs (these include some cases where the patient has hypersensitivity and a restoration is indicated)
  • Subjects with age range 18-80 years old
  • Teeth with normal occlusion relationships

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects with fewer than 20 teeth
  • Subjects with poor oral hygiene and/or uncontrolled periodontal disease
  • Teeth with NCCLs with mechanical undercuts
  • Subjects with known allergies to HEMA or resin-based materials. The materials to be used are HEMA and/or resin-based materials.
  • Subjects with medical conditions that contraindicate dental treatment.
  • Subjects with xerostomia. Xerostomia is a condition where there is a decrease salivary flow (dry mouth). Decrease salivary flow is a known factor that affects the long-term prognosis of dental restorations, and would be a confounder.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Retention

Time Frame: 6 and 18 months post-baseline

Overall retention of restorations

Secondary Outcomes

  • Color Match(18 months post-baseline)
  • Anatomic Form(18 months post-baseline)
  • Marginal Adaptation and/or Integrity(18 months post-baseline)
  • Cavosurface Margin Discoloration(18 months post-baseline)
  • Secondary Caries(18 months post-baseline)
  • Post Operative Sensitivity(18 months post-baseline)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

André V. Ritter, DDS, MS

Professor UNC School of Dentistry

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Clinical Evaluation Of A New Two-Component... | Clinical Trial