跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03675334
NCT03675334已完成不适用

Clinical Comparison Between the Use of a Connective Tissue Graft or a Porcine Collagen Matrix (Mucoderm) for Treatment of Gingival Recessions Type 1: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

University of Sao Paulo1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 18 人开始时间: 2016年4月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
18
试验地点
1
主要终点
Root coverage after 6 months

研究概览

简要总结

Coronally advanced flap plus connective tissue graft (CTG) is the gold standard therapy for root coverage. The bioabsorbable porcine collagen matrix (CM) has been widely used in periodontal and mucogingival surgery as a substitute for CTG and has achieved similar results. The CM has the advantage of no need of a second surgical area and availability overcoming the limitations of donor site in autograft.

The aim of this study is to investigate the use of Mucoderm® in root coverage procedures combined with extended coronally positioned flap (ECAF), test group (TG), in comparison to the connective tissue graft associated with the ECAF, control group (CG).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

The clinical parameters were screened by one single examiner that was not aware of the procedures

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • CEJ without significant damage;
  • localized bilateral RT1 gingival recession ≥3 mm in the same arch

排除标准

  • previous periodontal surgical treatment on the involved sites;
  • pregnants or lactating
  • compromised systemic health and contraindications for periodontal surgery

研究组 & 干预措施

Test Group

Active Comparator

Active comparator: gingival recession

the aim of this study is to compare if the collagen matrix graft is as efficient as a substitute for the connective graft used in root coverage of gingival recessions

干预措施: Root coverage with collagen matrix graft (Procedure)

Test Group

Active Comparator

Active comparator: gingival recession

the aim of this study is to compare if the collagen matrix graft is as efficient as a substitute for the connective graft used in root coverage of gingival recessions

干预措施: Basic periodontal treatment (Other)

Control Group

Placebo Comparator

the aim of this study is to compare if the collagen matrix graft is as efficient as a substitute for the connective graft used in root coverage of gingival recessions. The control group was treated with the same technique as the collagen matrix graft.

干预措施: Root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft (Procedure)

Control Group

Placebo Comparator

the aim of this study is to compare if the collagen matrix graft is as efficient as a substitute for the connective graft used in root coverage of gingival recessions. The control group was treated with the same technique as the collagen matrix graft.

干预措施: Basic periodontal treatment (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Root coverage after 6 months

时间窗: 6 months

Root coverage is measured by the difference between the gingival recession height at 6 months and baseline

次要结局

  • Keratinized tissue gain after 6 months(6months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Arthur Belem Novaes Jr

Phd, Ms, DDs. Chairman of Periodontolgy

University of Sao Paulo

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验