Comparative Effects of Radial and Focused Extracorporeal Shock-wave Therapies in Coccydynia
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Coccyx Injury
- Registration Number
- NCT05157022
- Lead Sponsor
- Yuzuncu Yıl University
- Brief Summary
Comparison of the efficacy of coccydynia treatment with two different probes of the ESWT device
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 69
Inclusion Criteria
- Clinical diagnosis of coccydynia by clinical examination and X-ray imaging.
- be aged ≥18 at the time of diagnosis
- be give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Malignancy
- Those who have received ESWT treatment before
- Pediatric patients
- Patients with infection.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire 5 minutes higher scores mean better outcome.
Visual Analogue Scale 1 minute pain evaluation, higher scores mean worse outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie radial vs. focused ESWT in coccyx injury repair?
How does ESWT compare to corticosteroid injections for chronic coccydynia treatment outcomes?
Are there biomarkers predicting response to radial or focused shock-wave therapy in coccyx trauma patients?
What are the safety profiles and adverse event management strategies for radial/focused ESWT in coccydynia?
What combination therapies enhance ESWT efficacy for coccyx-related pain management in clinical trials?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
🇹🇷Van, Turkey
Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi🇹🇷Van, Turkey