MedPath

Electrical Stimulation After Botulinum Toxin Injections to the Upper Extremity

Not Applicable
Conditions
Stroke
Interventions
Device: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
Device: Sham Electrical Stimulation
Registration Number
NCT04217187
Lead Sponsor
Texas Woman's University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of using electrical stimulation to improve upper extremity function in stroke survivors who receive botulinum toxin injections for spasticity. We hypothesize that individuals who receive the electrical stimulation could demonstrate improved benefit of the botulinum toxin injections and improved functional use of their weaker upper extremity.

Detailed Description

This is a pragmatic investigation that will utilize a two group comparison to compare electrical stimulation to a sham stimulation in individuals who are scheduled to receive botulinum toxin injections to their upper extremity for spasticity management. The electrical stimulation will be to the antagonist muscles of the injected muscles of the upper extremity and will be administered for 4 weeks post injections.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
28
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of stroke, within first 6 months post stroke, have not previously received botulinum toxin injections for upper extremity spasticity, hemiplegic upper extremtity, able to communicate in English.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • contraindication for electrical stimulation (presence of implanted cardiac or other medical device, open wound on the wrist or hand, malignancy), fixed contracture of the elbow, wrist or hand, inability to follow simple directions, pregnancy.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Electrical Stimulation GroupNeuromuscular Electrical StimulationThis arm will receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the antagonist muscles of the upper extremity.
Sham Stimulation GroupSham Electrical StimulationThis arm will receive sensory stimulation without muscle contraction to the antagonist muscles of the upper extremity.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Measure- Arm and Hand Recovery StageBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after injections

Impairment level assessment to measure changes in active motor control and isolated movement in the upper extremity. The arm and the hand receive a separate score. The score ranges from 1 to 7. A higher score indicates better arm function.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Action Research Arm TestBaseline, 1 month and 6 months

Standardized measure of upper extremity function. The total score ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates better arm function.

Modified Ashworth Scale for the Upper ExtremityBaseline, 1 month and 6 months

Measure of spasticity. Each muscle group (i.e. elbow flexors) is scored from 0-4 with a 0 indicating no increase in muscle tone and a 4 indicating the affected part is rigid. A decrease in score indicates a decrease in spasticity.

Motor Activity LogBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after injections

Structured interview to measure perceived function of the upper extremity during daily tasks. There is a separate score for the amount of use and how well measures. Each scale ranges from 0-5 and a higher score indicates better arm function.

Box and Block TestBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after injections

Standardized measure of upper extremity function. The score is the number of blocks transported within one minute. A higher score indicates better arm function.

Numeric Pain Rating ScaleBaseline, 1 month and 6 months

Self report of current, best and worst pain of upper extremity in the past 24 hours. Scale ranges from 0-10 with a 0 indicating no pain and a 10 indicating severe pain. A decrease in score indicates less pain.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

TIRR Memorial Hermann

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath