Electrical Stimulation After Botulinum Toxin Injections to the Upper Extremity
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Interventions
- Device: Neuromuscular Electrical StimulationDevice: Sham Electrical Stimulation
- Registration Number
- NCT04217187
- Lead Sponsor
- Texas Woman's University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of using electrical stimulation to improve upper extremity function in stroke survivors who receive botulinum toxin injections for spasticity. We hypothesize that individuals who receive the electrical stimulation could demonstrate improved benefit of the botulinum toxin injections and improved functional use of their weaker upper extremity.
- Detailed Description
This is a pragmatic investigation that will utilize a two group comparison to compare electrical stimulation to a sham stimulation in individuals who are scheduled to receive botulinum toxin injections to their upper extremity for spasticity management. The electrical stimulation will be to the antagonist muscles of the injected muscles of the upper extremity and will be administered for 4 weeks post injections.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28
- Diagnosis of stroke, within first 6 months post stroke, have not previously received botulinum toxin injections for upper extremity spasticity, hemiplegic upper extremtity, able to communicate in English.
- contraindication for electrical stimulation (presence of implanted cardiac or other medical device, open wound on the wrist or hand, malignancy), fixed contracture of the elbow, wrist or hand, inability to follow simple directions, pregnancy.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Electrical Stimulation Group Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation This arm will receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the antagonist muscles of the upper extremity. Sham Stimulation Group Sham Electrical Stimulation This arm will receive sensory stimulation without muscle contraction to the antagonist muscles of the upper extremity.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Measure- Arm and Hand Recovery Stage Baseline, 1 month and 6 months after injections Impairment level assessment to measure changes in active motor control and isolated movement in the upper extremity. The arm and the hand receive a separate score. The score ranges from 1 to 7. A higher score indicates better arm function.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Action Research Arm Test Baseline, 1 month and 6 months Standardized measure of upper extremity function. The total score ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates better arm function.
Modified Ashworth Scale for the Upper Extremity Baseline, 1 month and 6 months Measure of spasticity. Each muscle group (i.e. elbow flexors) is scored from 0-4 with a 0 indicating no increase in muscle tone and a 4 indicating the affected part is rigid. A decrease in score indicates a decrease in spasticity.
Motor Activity Log Baseline, 1 month and 6 months after injections Structured interview to measure perceived function of the upper extremity during daily tasks. There is a separate score for the amount of use and how well measures. Each scale ranges from 0-5 and a higher score indicates better arm function.
Box and Block Test Baseline, 1 month and 6 months after injections Standardized measure of upper extremity function. The score is the number of blocks transported within one minute. A higher score indicates better arm function.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale Baseline, 1 month and 6 months Self report of current, best and worst pain of upper extremity in the past 24 hours. Scale ranges from 0-10 with a 0 indicating no pain and a 10 indicating severe pain. A decrease in score indicates less pain.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
TIRR Memorial Hermann
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States