ong term follow-up: retention versus sacrifice of the PCL in total knee arthroplasty
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Osteoartrhritis of the Knee
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON28686
- Lead Sponsor
- o funding
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 75
Inclusion Criteria
Patients who participated in the previous randomized controlled trial (registration number: 2007-23; abr number: NL 16071.056.07; NTR 1673)
Exclusion Criteria
- deceased
- no known contact address
- reasons to believe that the patient is not capable – e.g. because of cognitive reasons - to fill out the questionnaires
- revision surgery of the index knee (except for revision of the patella)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational non invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary objective is to examine whether there is a difference in the patients perceived outcome score - WOMAC - between a posterior cruciate retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty compared with a posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty > 10 years postoperative.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The secondary objective is to examine if there is a difference in the long term results (>10 year FU) between the PCR and PS total knee arthroplasty in Range of Motion (ROM), Knee score (physician based outcome), patellofemoral pain, patellofemoral osteoarthritis, health related quality of life, patient satisfaction, complications and survival