Comparing two different designs of total knee arthroplasty in 120 patients: 60 patients receive the prosthesis in which the posterior cruciate ligament is spared and 60 patients receive the prosthesis in which the ligament is sacrificed.
Recruiting
- Conditions
- osteoarthritis, total knee arthroplasty, posterior cruciate ligament, posterior stabilized
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON24528
- Lead Sponsor
- Martini Hospital Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands
- Brief Summary
/A
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 120
Inclusion Criteria
1. Primary symptomatic osteoarthritis of
the knee;
Exclusion Criteria
1. Secondary osteoarthrosis of the knee;
2. (Active) arthritis (eg rheumatic disease);
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To examine whether there is a difference in patients perceived outcome between a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty compared with a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine whether there is a difference in range of motion between a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty compared with a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Additionally, to determine whether there is a difference in Knee Score (physician-based outcome score), health-related quality of life, gait parameters and femoral roll back.