Laser Interstitial Thermal Ablation and Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients With Spine Metastases
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord DiseasesSpinal Cord TumorSpine MetastasesNeoplasm MetastasisSpinal Cord Compression
- Interventions
- Procedure: Stereotactic Laser AblationRadiation: Stereotactic RadiosurgeryDiagnostic Test: MRI guided laser ablation
- Registration Number
- NCT05023772
- Lead Sponsor
- Henry Ford Health System
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to combine two complementary modes of treatment, spinal interstitial laser ablation and stereotactic spine radiosurgery (SSRS) for the treatment for spinal tumors near the spinal cord with an objective to improve tumor control, improve pain control, preserve function, and improve quality of life. We will also assess how effective these combined modes of treatment are in patients with spinal metastasis with an epidural component.
- Detailed Description
Primary Objectives:
1. Documenting rate of local control in patients who have received this combined treatment and
2. Documenting safety of MRI compatible hardware for MRI based image guidance
3. Determining the accuracy of the MRI-based image guidance
Secondary Objectives:
1. To determine local control at 1, 3, 6, 9, 18, and 24 months, and to compare to a historical control where patients received only SSRS at these time points and at 12 months.
2. To document the extent of epidural tumor regression at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
* Calculate decrease in epidural tumor volume (by volumetric measurements using Brain Lab Elements software)
* Calculate increase in thecal sac patency (by volumetric measurements using Brain Lab Elements software and according to Bilsky method
3. To determine overall survival at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
4. To assess changes in muscle strength, location and severity of spinal-related pain, sensory function, ability to ambulate, and neurological grading at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months compared with pretreatment baselines.
5. To assess the effect of treatment on quality of life, measured at 1 month and every 3 months after with validated outcome measure tools
6. To describe adverse side effects after treatment and to descriptively correlate those effects with radiographic findings, pain control, and quality of life.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Age > 18 years old. (The indication for this technique is controversial in skeletally immature patients.)
- Histologic diagnosis of solid malignant tumor (not one of the more radiosensitive histologic subtypes, see Exclusion Criteria), including but not limited to non-small cell lung cancer, breast, prostate, renal cell, melanoma, gastrointestinal, sarcoma, thyroid, head and neck primary, and unknown primary tumors.
- Quantification of the degree of epidural spinal cord compression as grade 1C, 2, or 3 by MRI, with and without contrast sequences. Axial T2 sequence is encouraged but not required.
- The vertebral body site to be treated must be located from T2 to L1
- No more than 3 contiguous or dis-contiguous vertebral levels involved with metastasis in the spine to be irradiated in a single session or 3 sessions.
- Motor strength ≥4 out of 5 in extremity or extremities affected by the level of the spinal cord compression (see section 4 for grading method).
- ECOG performance status <2 or Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >50
- Life expectancy >3 months.
- Inoperable disease because of patient refusal, neurosurgical evaluation, or any other medical reasons.
- Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) before study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.
- Prior conventional radiation to the same site is allowed as long as there is a greater than 3 months interval.
- Signed informed consent.
- Requires open spinal procedure or a percutaneous procedure without the use of image guidance.
- Primary tumors of radiosensitive histology (lymphoma, multiple myeloma, small cell carcinoma, germ cell tumors), as conventional radiation is likely to be effective in such cases.
- Unable to tolerate general anesthesia and prone position.
- Unable to undergo MRI scan of the spine.
- Inability to lie flat on a treatment table for >60 minutes.
- Pregnant. (Urine testing must be done no more than 10 days prior to surgery.)
- Prior conventional irradiation of the spine site and level to be treated with an interval shorter than 3 months.
- Frank cord compression or cord compression from bone components or configuration and acute neurological deficits (defined as motor strength <4/5 in extremity or extremities affected by the level of the spinal cord compression)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Experimental Treatment of Laser Interstitial Thermal Ablation Therapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Stereotactic Radiosurgery Patients will undergo laser interstitial thermal ablation and CT guided stereotactic radiosurgery via intensity-modulated radiation therapy on different dates within a one to fourteen day window. The order of treatment is at the treating physicians discretion. Experimental Treatment of Laser Interstitial Thermal Ablation Therapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery MRI guided laser ablation Patients will undergo laser interstitial thermal ablation and CT guided stereotactic radiosurgery via intensity-modulated radiation therapy on different dates within a one to fourteen day window. The order of treatment is at the treating physicians discretion. Experimental Treatment of Laser Interstitial Thermal Ablation Therapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Stereotactic Laser Ablation Patients will undergo laser interstitial thermal ablation and CT guided stereotactic radiosurgery via intensity-modulated radiation therapy on different dates within a one to fourteen day window. The order of treatment is at the treating physicians discretion.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Local Tumor Control Rate up to 24 months Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Local Tumor Control 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months Time to local failure will be monitored continuously using Bayesian method.
Adverse Events up to 24 months To describe adverse side effects after treatment and descriptively correlate those effects with radiographic findings, pain control, and quality of life.
Overall Survival 6, 12, 18, and 24 months Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used.
Postoperative response to treatment assessed by MRI 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months Routine MRI of the spine with and without contrast will be obtained at each follow-up visit. These post-treatment scans will be analyzed and compared to baseline scans for assessment of treatment response and local control. Bilsky grading system will be used.
Changes in symptoms assessed by physical examination 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months and annually thereafter The Physical Exam includes a general exam:(HEENT) Head, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat evaluation, chest, heart, abdomen and extremities exam. Changes will be compared to baseline measurements. Negative changes will be evaluated by the neurosurgeon and radiation oncologist to determine if the change is related to a local failure or progression of systemic disease. Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used.
Changes in symptoms assessed by neurological examination 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months The neurological examination includes: mental status (tested through history taking), cranial nerves (observation of eyes, face, voice, and coordination during history taking and as patient moves about the exam room), motor system (visual inspection, tone, muscle strength and endurance, assigned score of 0-5 for each muscle, a score of 0 would mean no muscular contraction, and a score of 5 would mean movement against full resistance, normal strength), reflexes, sensory system (vibration in toes; pinprick in feet); coordination (truncal stability, fine finger movement, toe tapping, finger-nose-finger, heel-knee-shin), and station and gait (gait including arising from chair without hands, walking on toes, heels, and heel to toe). Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Henry Ford Hospital
🇺🇸Detroit, Michigan, United States