Hepatic Vein Pressure Gradient(HVPG)-Guided Therapy vs Carvedilol Plus Endotherapy for the Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
- Conditions
- Liver Cirrhoses
- Sponsor
- Air Force Military Medical University, China
- Enrollment
- 220
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Cumulative incidence of esophageal variceal rebleeding
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Variceal bleeding is a major complication of cirrhosis, associated with a hospital mortality rate of 10%-20%. Surviving patients are at high risk for recurrent hemorrhage. For these reasons, management should be directed at its prevention. Endoscopic variceal band ligation (EBL) in combination with non-selective β-blocker (NSBB) therapy is the recommended first line therapy. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) is the most effective method to prevent rebleeding, however, it is burdened with increased hepatic encephalopathy and deterioration of liver function in patients with advanced cirrhosis. So TIPS placement forms an alternative if first line therapy fails.
Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is currently the best available method to evaluate the presence and severity of portal hypertension. Patients who experience a reduction in HVPG of ≥20% or to <12mmHg in response to drug therapy are defined as 'responders'. The lowest rebleeding rates are observed in patients on secondary prophylaxis who are HVPG responders. A recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that combination therapy is only marginally more effective than drug therapy. This suggests that pharmacological therapy is the cornerstone of combination therapy. Adding EBL may not be the optimal approach to improve the outcome of HVPG nonresponders and HVPG non-responders are a special high-risk population that may benefit from a more aggressive approach, such as an early decision for TIPS. It recently was shown that TIPS placement within 72 hours after acute bleeding not only prevented recurrent bleeding but also improved survival. These raise the question of whether ligation together with NSBB should remain the first choice for elective secondary prophylaxis.
Therefore, the purpose of the study is to compare whether HVPG-guided therapy is superior to standard combination therapy for the prevention of variceal bleeding in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Investigators
Tie Jun
Primary investigator
Air Force Military Medical University, China
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Confirmed diagnosis of liver cirrhosis
- •History of esophageal variceal bleeding confirmed by endoscopy
- •Time interval between index bleeding and randomization \> 5 days.
- •Child-Pugh score \< 12,MELD score\<19
Exclusion Criteria
- •Clinical manifestation of active bleeding
- •Gastric variceal bleeding: GOV2,IGV1 or IGV2
- •Degree of main portal vein thrombosis \> 50%
- •Refractory ascites
- •Contraindications of TIPS
- •Contraindications of NSBB
- •Budd-Chiari Syndrome
- •Malignancy tumor
- •Uncontrolled infections
- •History of portal-systemic shunt surgery
Arms & Interventions
HVPG-guided therapy
HVPG will be determined before randomization. In this arm, patients with an adequate reduction in HVPG (responders) receive carvedilol whereas nonresponders receive TIPS.
Intervention: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
HVPG-guided therapy
HVPG will be determined before randomization. In this arm, patients with an adequate reduction in HVPG (responders) receive carvedilol whereas nonresponders receive TIPS.
Intervention: Carvedilol
Standard therapy
In this group, both responders and nonresponders will receive combination therapy of carvedilol and endoscopic variceal ligation as first-line therapy. If first-line therapy fails, TIPS will considered.
Intervention: Carvedilol
Standard therapy
In this group, both responders and nonresponders will receive combination therapy of carvedilol and endoscopic variceal ligation as first-line therapy. If first-line therapy fails, TIPS will considered.
Intervention: Endoscopic variceal ligation
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Cumulative incidence of esophageal variceal rebleeding
Time Frame: 12 months
Source of variceal rebleeding will be determined by endoscopy.
Secondary Outcomes
- Cumulative incidence of variceal rebleeding related death(12 months)
- Cumulative incidence of patients with further decompensation(12 months)
- Cumulative incidence of patients with ascites(12 months)
- Cumulative incidence of patients with hepatic encephalopathy(12 months)
- Cumulative incidence of all cause mortality(12 months)