MedPath

Closing -TB GAPs - for People Living With HIV: TB Guidance for Adaptable Patient-Centered Service

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
HIV Coinfection
Tuberculosis Infection
Tuberculosis
Interventions
Other: patient-centered TB preventive therapy
Other: TB preventive therapy adherence support
Registration Number
NCT05342064
Lead Sponsor
Baylor College of Medicine
Brief Summary

Tuberculosis (TB) is the world's leading infectious cause of mortality and responsible for 1/3 of deaths in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV). Children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV) are disproportionately affected due to inadequate preventive services, large case detection gaps, treatment and adherence challenges, and knowledge gaps. This project will generate evidence to inform interventions targeting several of these weaknesses in the TB/HIV cascade of care.

Early detection and treatment of TB improve outcomes in people living with HIV (PLHIV). A key challenge in the detection of HIV-associated TB has been the implementation of screening that identifies the correct population for diagnostic testing. Increasing evidence demonstrates the poor performance of recommended symptom screens and diagnostic approaches. Hence, the investigators aim to define a more accurate TB screening and testing strategy among PLHIV (Objective 1 and Objective 2).

TB preventive treatment (TPT) averts HIV-associated TB. Nevertheless, among PLHIV, TPT initiation and completion rates are sub-optimal and effective delivery strategies are not defined. As such, the investigators aim to identify the most effective TPT delivery strategy through shared decision making and by integrating approaches proven to be effective at improving HIV treatment adherence (Objective 3).

Although evidence demonstrates that isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) is cost-effective in young children living in TB/HIV high burden settings, the cost-effectiveness of newer short-course TPT has primarily been studied in the context of a TB low-burden, high-income setting. The investigators aim to generate evidence to fill this knowledge gap and inform policy for PLHIV living in TB/HIV high burden settings (Objective 4).

This study is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of a financial assistance award totaling an anticipated $5,000,000 over five years with 100 percent funded by CDC/HHS.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
6500
Inclusion Criteria
  • HIV positive or HIV exposed and presumptively positive while awaiting confirmatory testing in infants
Exclusion Criteria
  • do not provide informed consent or assent as appropriate or are currently being treated for TB

OBJECTIVE 3:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • negative TB symptom screen OR for whom TB disease has been ruled out in accordance with WHO Guidelines in adults and according to consensus definitions for child TB

Exclusion Criteria:

  • do not provide informed consent or assent as appropriate or are currently being treated for TB

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SEQUENTIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
TB screening and evaluation followed by TPT via a decentralized delivery systempatient-centered TB preventive therapyThe intervention phase includes i) enrolling participants who have had TB disease excluded and allowing participant selection of a preferred TPT regimen, and ii) randomizing participants to one of two participant adherence support modalities.
TB screening and evaluation followed by TPT via a decentralized delivery systemTB preventive therapy adherence supportThe intervention phase includes i) enrolling participants who have had TB disease excluded and allowing participant selection of a preferred TPT regimen, and ii) randomizing participants to one of two participant adherence support modalities.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
TB screening24-32 months

Sensitivity of C-reactive protein for TB screening compared to the sensitivity of the WHO symptom screening using the McNemar test

TB diagnosis24-32 months

Sensitivity of Xpert Host Response Cartridge compared with the sensitivity of Xpert Ultra on sputum or on gastric aspirate using the McNemar test

TPT prevention outcomes48 months

Comparing TPT completion rates in participants randomized to bi-directional messaging support vs. standard support

Cost-effectiveness32 months

Estimating the incremental cost-effectiveness of new shortened TPT regimens measured as cost per DALYS averted for each TPT strategy and the enhanced participant support modality compared with current standard of care

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of participants selecting 3HP and the proportion selecting 6H when offered a choice within a decentralized model48 months
Time-to-treatment initiation24-32 months

For all screening and diagnostic tests of the study

Compare Alere-LAM diagnostic accuracy with that of the SILVAMP-LAM with both spot and early-morning urine samples24-32 months
Prevalence of extrapulmonary TB by means of point of care ultrasound in participants diagnosed with TB24-32 months
Sensitivity of SILVAMP-LAM versus the WHO symptom screening24-32 months
Number of life years saved through novel TPT approaches32 months
Diagnostic performance of mask sampling with differing forms of quiet and forced expiration (i.e., talking, singing) against standard approaches of sampling24-32 months
Analyze different processing approaches for oral swabs prior to testing by Xpert Ultra vs. other microbiological diagnostic and drug susceptibility tests24-32 months
Assess ultrasound inter-reader agreement between hands-on operators AND remote expert reviewers24-32 months
Compare the proportion of clinician and computer aided detection chest radiograph interpretation with algorithmic approaches against clinical and microbiologic reference standards24-32 months
Specificity of chest radiography versus the WHO symptom screening24-32 months

Chest radiography will be interpreted as normal or abnormal for the purposes of TB screening and will be evaluated using a standardized interpretation form

Area under the curve of SILVAMP-LAM versus the WHO symptom screening24-32 months
Area under the receiver operator curve of Xpert Ultra performed on stool versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Result reporting rate24-32 months

For all screening and diagnostic tests of the study

Description of the number of participants with different TB treatment and TPT outcomes at the completion of respective therapies48 months

At individual study end point or at study closure, participants will be classified as i) retained in care, ii) died, iii) lost to follow-up, or iv) transferred out.

Assess ultrasound inter-reader agreement between hands-on operators24-32 months
Sensitivity of point of care CRP versus the WHO symptom screening24-32 months

CRP will be performed on whole blood using the FDA approved POC iChroma assay. A CRP of \> 10 mg/L will be considered positive

Measure the association between participant factors and screening and diagnostic positivity rates24-32 months

Participant factors are inclusive but not limited to TB infection status, immunologic, virologic, demographic, socioeconomic and clinical factors. The screening and diagnosis approaches are: point of care C-reactive protein, chest radiography, Fuji-LAM, Xpert Ultra performed on oral swabs and stool specimens and ultrasound.

Laboratory turnaround time24-32 months

For all screening and diagnostic tests of the study

Compare alternative stool processing techniques and molecular diagnostics/tests of MTB resistance against clinical and microbiologic reference standards24-32 months

Done using de-identified stool collected and bio-banked during the study.

Compare clinician read of chest radiograph with point-of-care ultrasound interpretation to determine agreement and additive yield of each method24-32 months

this outcome will be studied only in Eswatini and Malawi

Area under the receiver operator curve of point of care CRP versus the WHO symptom screening24-32 months

CRP will be performed on whole blood using the FDA approved POC iChroma assay. A CRP of \> 10 mg/L will be considered positive

Sensitivity of LF-LAM versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Specificity of LF-LAM versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Sensitivity of Xpert Ultra performed on a gelatin filter removed from a participant's mask versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Area under the receiver operator curve of Xpert Ultra performed on a gelatin filter removed from a participant's mask versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Proportion of participants completing 6H and the proportion completing 3HP among participants randomized to standard support vs. bidirectional messaging48 months

Treatment completion will be defined as receipt of at least 80% of doses during a pre-specified period of time and consistent with WHO definitions.

Proportion of participants initiated on TPT in the control phase vs. the intervention phase48 months

Initiation rates will be estimated by the number of participants initiating TPT divided by the number of instances that TPT was offered

Number of active TB cases averted through novel TPT approaches32 months
Sensitivity of Xpert Ultra performed on stool versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Specificity of Xpert Ultra performed on stool versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Area under the receiver operator curve of LF-LAM versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Sensitivity of point of care ultrasound versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Area under the receiver operator curve of Xpert Host Response Cartridge on blood specimen versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months

The blood specimen is collected at the time of positive screening

Specificity of SILVAMP-LAM versus the WHO symptom screening24-32 months
Specificity of point of care CRP versus the WHO symptom screening24-32 months

CRP will be performed on whole blood using the FDA approved POC iChroma assay. A CRP of \> 10 mg/L will be considered positive

Sensitivity of chest radiography versus the WHO symptom screening24-32 months

Chest radiography will be interpreted as normal or abnormal for the purposes of TB screening and will be evaluated using a standardized interpretation form

Area under the receiver operator curve of chest radiography versus the WHO symptom screening24-32 months

Chest radiography will be interpreted as normal or abnormal for the purposes of TB screening and will be evaluated using a standardized interpretation form

Sensitivity of Xpert Ultra performed on an oral/buccal swab versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Specificity of Xpert Ultra performed on an oral/buccal swab versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Area under the ROC curve of Xpert Ultra performed on an oral/buccal swab versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Specificity of Xpert Ultra performed on a gelatin filter removed from a participant's mask versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Specificity of point of care ultrasound versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Area under the receiver operator curve of point of care ultrasound versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months
Sensitivity of Xpert Host Response Cartridge on blood specimen versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months

The blood specimen is collected at the time of positive screening

Specificity of Xpert Host Response Cartridge on blood specimen versus Xpert Ultra completed on sputum or gastric aspirate24-32 months

The blood specimen is collected at the time of positive screening

Sensitivity of chest radiography for TB screening compared to the sensitivity of the WHO symptom screening using the McNemar test24-32 months
Sensitivity of SILVAMP-LAM for TB screening compared to the sensitivity of the WHO symptom screening using the McNemar test24-32 months

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation

🇺🇬

Kampala, Uganda

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath