Comparison of Minimal Invasive Lens Surgery and Traditional Cataract Surgery
- Conditions
- Congenital Cataract
- Interventions
- Procedure: minimal invasive lens surgeryProcedure: traditional cataract surgery
- Registration Number
- NCT03230799
- Lead Sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Brief Summary
Previously, we have developed a minimal invasive lens surgery in the purpose of reduce post-operative complications of congenital cataract. This prospective, randomized controlled study aims at comparing the prognosis of the minimal invasive lens surgery and the traditional cataract surgery for treating congenital cataracts.
- Detailed Description
Patients with congenital cataract that requires surgical intervention are enrolled. Then the patients are assigned to two groups: Group I: the participants receive a minimal invasive lens surgery, while in Group II, the participants receive a traditional cataract surgery. A secondary intraocular lens implantation is performed when the patient is two years old for both Group I and Group II. Investigators then compare the visual acuity, incidence of high intraocular pressure, incidence of visual axis opacification, uveitis and iris/pupil abnormality between two groups, to evaluate and compare the prognosis of minimal invasive lens surgery and traditional cataract surgery for treating congenital cataracts.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Age between 1 month and 24 months
- Uncomplicated congenital cataract (≥ 3 mm central dense opacity) in one or both eyes with an intact non-fibrotic capsular bag
- Informed consent signed by a parent or legal guardian
- confirmed or suspected hereditary cataract, including and not restricted to family history of congenital cataract
- Intraocular pressure >21 mmHg
- Preterm birth (<28 weeks)
- Presence of other ocular diseases (keratitis, keratoleukoma, aniridia, glaucoma) or systemic disease (congenital heart disease, ischemic encephalopathy)
- History of ocular diseases (any congenital eye diseases, such as, congenital cataract, congenital glaucoma, congenital aniridia) in the family
- History of ocular trauma
- Microcornea
- Persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous
- Rubella
- Lowe syndrome
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description minimal invasive lens surgery minimal invasive lens surgery Peripheral capsulorhexis opening (1.0-1.5 mm)+irrigation/aspiration traditional cataract surgery traditional cataract surgery Central anterior continuous capsulorhexis (5-6 mm)+ irrigation/aspiration + posterior capsulorhexis + anterior vitrectomy(ACCC+ I/A + PCCC + Anti-vit)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Best correctied visual acuity recorded at each follow-up to five years of age. Determined with the Teller's acuity card, the Lea symbol visual acuity chart or the ETDRS chart according the patient's age.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method High intra-ocular pressure after lens removal to five years of age. Determined with Tono-Pen tonometer at each follow-up
Visual axis opacification after lens removal to five years of age. Determined with slit-lamp photography at each follow-up
Bi-ocular visual function performed when the patient is four years old and five years old. Determined with synoptophore
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center,Sun Yat-sen U
🇨🇳Guangzhou, Guangdong, China