MedPath

EPLBD With Limited EST vs. EPLBD for Choledocholithiasis

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Choledocholithiasis
Interventions
Procedure: ELPBD+ESD
Procedure: EPLBD
Registration Number
NCT05056506
Lead Sponsor
Jianfeng Yang
Brief Summary

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) for choledocholithiasis is known to be comparable to endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) especially in cases of small stones. With larger stones (\> 10 mm), EPBD with conventional balloon, which have a diameter of 6-8 mm, was reported as less effective for extraction of stones, requiring additional mechanical lithotripsy (ML). The present study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of limited EST plus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EST-EPBD) with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large choledocholithiasis.

Detailed Description

ERCP is the best option to remove bile duct stones. It can be done by either endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD). Large bile duct stones appear to be more difficult to remove with conventional methods, such as EST and EPBD. Therefore, extraction of large bile duct stones may require mechanical lithotripsy (ML) as an adjunctive procedure. The primary complication of ML is basket and stone impaction, which can lead to complications such as pancreatitis and cholangitis. Some recent studies have reported the efficacy of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) alone or combined with limited EST, establishing it as a safe treatment for the removal of large bile duct stones. The investigators conducted the present study to compare the therapeutic outcome and complications between EPLBD alone and limited EST plus EPLBD for the treatment of large bile duct stones.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
168
Inclusion Criteria
  • large bile duct stones (≥10 mm)
Exclusion Criteria
  • pregnancy
  • refusal of written informed consent
  • Patients with benign or malignant biliary stricture
  • Contraindications to ERCP exist
  • Complicated with acute pancreatitis or acute cholangitis
  • Coagulation dysfunction,thrombocytopenia
  • prior EST or EPBD
  • Patients after gastrointestinal reconstruction

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Endoscopic papillary Large balloon dilation combined with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy groupELPBD+ESDEndoscopic papillary large balloon dilation combined with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy to extract bile duct stones
Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation groupEPLBDEndoscopic papillary large balloon dilation to extract bile duct stones
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The incidence of complicationswithin 1 months after the procedure

The incidence of complications

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The success rate of 1st session treatmentwithin 1 months after the procedure

The success rate of 1st session treatment

The rate of mechanical lithotripsywithin 1 months after the procedure

The rate of mechanical lithotripsy

Total ercp timeswithin 1 months after the procedure

Total ercp numbers

Overall successful stone removal ratewithin 1 months after the procedure

Overall successful stone removal rate

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital

🇨🇳

Shanghai, Shanghai, China

Hangzhou First People's Hospital

🇨🇳

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath