Comparison of the effect of two different types of drugs when mixed to the local anaesthetics for upper limb block
- Conditions
- Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/05/025082
- Lead Sponsor
- Jyoti Mala
- Brief Summary
Supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade is the common approach to provide surgical anesthesia of upper limb, was first described by Kulenkampff in 1911.(1) It is an efficient regional anesthetic technique for upper limb surgeries. Which is a reliable, alternative to general anesthesia for certain group of patients as it is devoid of undesired effects of general anesthesia and stress of laryngoscopy. The postoperative period is also free from pain, nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression. Adjuvants are added to local anaesthetics to improve various block characteristics in terms of onset of action ,duration of analgesia with lesser adverse effect. Various study has been done using different types of adjuvants in different combination of local anaesthetics for various nerve blocks. In our study we will use levobupivacaine LA because it is relatively safe in terms of less cardiac and neurotoxic adverse effects. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective an alpha 2 agonist which, when used as an adjuvant , prolongs the duration of action without causing respiratory depression. Nalbuphine is recently introduced opioid agonist-antagonist. Unlike other opioids it has got ceiling effect. Furthermore,use of ultrasound (US) has significantly improved the quality of nerve blocks by direct visualization of nerves and related anatomical structures, needle trajectory and spread of local anesthetics (LAs) during injection [2-7]. In addition, US guidance increases success rate, minimizes LAs volume needed for effective nerve block, and avoids potential complications such as intraneural or intravascular injection [2,4,5]. In this study, we plan to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 70
- Patients posted for upper limb surgery of either side 2.
- Patients of ASA physical status 1 & 2 3.
- Patients between 18-50 years of age of either sex 4.
- Patients able to comprehend and willing to participate.
- Patient’s refusal to participate 2.
- Patients of ASA physical status3 & 4 3.
- Any allergy to local anaesthetics 4.
- Coagulation disorders 5.
- Infection at the site of intervention 6.
- History of any underlying cardiac, renal or hepatic dysfunction •Pregnant patient.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Onset of motor block 3 months 2. Onset of sensory block 3 months 3. Duration of analgesia 3 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Hemodynamic stability 2. Side effects
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences
🇮🇳Patna, BIHAR, India
Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences🇮🇳Patna, BIHAR, IndiaDr Arvind KumarPrincipal investigator9534870908arvind007kumar@yahoo.com