Comparing the passage of breathing tube into the windpipe using, either an IGel or BlockBuster LMA which are two different types of breathing devices
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 160
Inclusion Criteria
ASA I-II patients,
Body Mass Index <30 kg/m2
All elective surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation
Adequate mouth opening : >2 fingers
Mallampati Grade 1 - 4
Exclusion Criteria
ASA III-V
Body Mass Index >30 kg/m2
Emergency Procedures
Contraindications to supraglottic airway devices
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare success rate of fibreoptic guided tracheal intubation through I-GelTM and BlockBusterTM supraglottic airway devicesTimepoint: Immediately after confirmed endo tracheal intubation(confirmed by chest rise, capnogram and auscultation)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1 Insertion time of supraglottic devices <br/ ><br>2 Oropharyngeal leak pressure in neutral position <br/ ><br>3 Fibreoptic view scoring system <br/ ><br>4 Intubation time through the device <br/ ><br>5 Incidence of post op complications <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1 Insertion time of supraglottic devices:After successful placement of IGel or BlockBuster LMA <br/ ><br>2.Oropharyngeal leak pressure in neutral position:After successful placement of IGel or BlockBuster LMA <br/ ><br>3Fibreoptic view scoring system: After successful placement of IGel or BlockBuster LMA <br/ ><br>4 Intubation time through the device: After successful endotracheal intubation fibreoptically through the IGel or BlockBuster LMA <br/ ><br>5.Incidence of post op complications: After 24 hours of extubation <br/ ><br>